Department of Biology, Shantou University, Shantou, Guangdong 515063, China.
Bioresour Technol. 2012 Mar;107:131-4. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.060. Epub 2011 Dec 17.
Mass production of microalgae generally requires the injection of CO(2) into open ponds or photo-bioreactors. The present study compares the CO(2) injection efficiency into seawater of a porous stone air diffuser and a venturi. CO(2) was injected at flow rates of 400, 700 and 1000 standard mL/min and 4, 7 and 10 standard L/min into a small and a large pond, respectively until the pH decreased from 7.8 to 6.8. No significant differences in CO(2) injection efficiency between the three CO(2) flow rates (p>0.05) were observed; however, CO(2) injection efficiency with venturi was about 100% (p<0.05) higher than that of the air diffuser. Therefore, it is possible to both reduce the cost and increase the effectiveness of CO(2) dissolution in seawater by using venturi operated at a lower flow rate, i.e. 400 standard mL/min in a small pond and 4 standard L/min in a large pond.
大规模生产微藻通常需要将 CO(2)注入开放式池塘或光生物反应器。本研究比较了多孔石空气扩散器和文丘里管将 CO(2)注入海水的效率。将 CO(2)以 400、700 和 1000 标准 mL/min 以及 4、7 和 10 标准 L/min 的流速分别注入小池塘和大池塘中,直到 pH 值从 7.8 降低到 6.8。在三种 CO(2)流速下(p>0.05),CO(2)注入效率没有显著差异;然而,文丘里管的 CO(2)注入效率比空气扩散器高约 100%(p<0.05)。因此,通过在小池塘中以 400 标准 mL/min 的较低流速以及在大池塘中以 4 标准 L/min 的较低流速操作文丘里管,可以降低 CO(2)在海水中的溶解成本并提高其效率。