• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社区的青少年物质使用循证治疗的效果。

The effectiveness of community-based delivery of an evidence-based treatment for adolescent substance use.

机构信息

Drug Policy Research Center, RAND, Santa Monica, CA 90407, USA.

出版信息

J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012 Sep;43(2):211-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Dec 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2011.11.003
PMID:22209657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3319520/
Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of motivational enhancement therapy/cognitive behavioral therapy-5 (MET/CBT-5) when delivered in community practice settings relative to standard community-based adolescent treatment. A quasi-experimental strategy was used to adjust for pretreatment differences between the MET/CBT-5 sample (n = 2,293) and those who received standard care (n = 458). Results suggest that youth who received MET/CBT-5 fared better than comparable youth in the control group on five of six 12-month outcomes. A low follow-up rate (54%) in the MET/CBT-5 sample raised concerns about nonresponse bias in the treatment effect estimates. Sensitivity analyses suggest that although modest differences in outcomes between the MET/CBT-5 nonrespondents and respondents would yield no significant differences between the two groups on two of the six outcomes, very large differences in outcomes between responders and nonresponders would be required for youth receiving MET/CBT-5 to have fared better had they received standard outpatient care.

摘要

本研究评估了动机增强疗法/认知行为疗法-5（MET/CBT-5）在社区实践环境中的有效性，相对于标准的基于社区的青少年治疗。采用准实验策略来调整 MET/CBT-5 样本（n=2293）和接受标准护理的样本（n=458）之间治疗前的差异。结果表明，在六项 12 个月的结果中，接受 MET/CBT-5 的青少年在五项结果上的表现优于对照组的可比青少年。MET/CBT-5 样本的随访率低（54%）引起了对治疗效果估计中无应答偏倚的关注。敏感性分析表明，尽管 MET/CBT-5 无应答者和应答者之间的结果存在适度差异，但如果接受 MET/CBT-5 的青少年接受标准门诊护理，那么两组在六项结果中的两项上也不会有显著差异，需要在应答者和无应答者之间存在非常大的结果差异，才能说明接受 MET/CBT-5 的青少年表现更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/966c/3319520/ed34640e8fc7/nihms339676f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/966c/3319520/96ebf9f1daa1/nihms339676f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/966c/3319520/8cc52ad9253f/nihms339676f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/966c/3319520/ed34640e8fc7/nihms339676f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/966c/3319520/96ebf9f1daa1/nihms339676f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/966c/3319520/8cc52ad9253f/nihms339676f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/966c/3319520/ed34640e8fc7/nihms339676f3.jpg

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of community-based delivery of an evidence-based treatment for adolescent substance use.基于社区的青少年物质使用循证治疗的效果。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012 Sep;43(2):211-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
2
Using a cross-study design to assess the efficacy of motivational enhancement therapy-cognitive behavioral therapy 5 (MET/CBT5) in treating adolescents with cannabis-related disorders.采用跨研究设计评估动机增强治疗-认知行为治疗 5（MET/CBT5）治疗与大麻相关障碍的青少年的疗效。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011 May;72(3):380-9. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.380.
3
Psychosocial interventions for cannabis use disorder.针对大麻使用障碍的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 5;2016(5):CD005336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005336.pub4.
4
Randomized Clinical Trial of Computerized and Clinician-Delivered CBT in Comparison With Standard Outpatient Treatment for Substance Use Disorders: Primary Within-Treatment and Follow-Up Outcomes.计算机化认知行为疗法与临床医生提供的认知行为疗法与标准门诊治疗物质使用障碍的随机临床试验：治疗内和随访的主要结局。
Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 1;175(9):853-863. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17090978. Epub 2018 May 24.
5
Addressing the opioid epidemic with behavioral interventions for adolescents and young adults: A quasi-experimental design.采用行为干预措施解决青少年和青年群体阿片类药物滥用问题：一项准实验设计。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Oct;87(10):941-951. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000406.
6
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校：一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
7
Combined Pharmacotherapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults With Alcohol or Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.酒精或物质使用障碍成人的联合药物治疗和认知行为疗法：系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208279. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8279.
8
Comparative effectiveness of psychological interventions for treating the psychological consequences of sexual abuse in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.心理干预治疗儿童和青少年性虐待心理后果的效果比较：网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 5;6(6):CD013361. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013361.pub2.
9
The impact of disruptive behavior disorder on substance use treatment outcome in adolescents.破坏性行为障碍对青少年物质使用治疗结果的影响。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013 May-Jun;44(5):506-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2012.11.003. Epub 2012 Dec 8.
10
Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12-step programs for alcohol use disorder.戒酒互助会及其他针对酒精使用障碍的12步康复计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 11;3(3):CD012880. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012880.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Can inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) be used to assess differences of CRBSI rates between non-tunneled femoral and jugular CVCs in PICU patients?可否采用逆概率处理加权法（IPTW）来评估 ICU 患者中非隧道式股静脉和颈内静脉中央导管（CVC）的中心导管相关血流感染（CRBSI）发生率差异？
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07571-4.
2
Feasibility and impact of implementing motivational enhancement therapy-cognitive behavioral therapy as a substance use treatment intervention in school-based settings.在学校环境中实施动机增强疗法-认知行为疗法作为物质使用治疗干预措施的可行性和影响。
Adv Sch Ment Health Promot. 2014;7(2):88-104. doi: 10.1080/1754730x.2014.888223. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the Sensitivity of Treatment Effect Estimates to Differential Follow-Up Rates: Implications for Translational Research.评估治疗效果估计值对不同随访率的敏感性：对转化研究的启示
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2012 Jun 1;12(2-3):84-103. doi: 10.1007/s10742-012-0089-7.
2
A Large-scale Dissemination and Implementation Model for Evidence-based Treatment and Continuing Care.基于证据的治疗与持续护理的大规模传播与实施模式
Clin Psychol (New York). 2011 Mar;18(1):67-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2011.01236.x.
3
Using a cross-study design to assess the efficacy of motivational enhancement therapy-cognitive behavioral therapy 5 (MET/CBT5) in treating adolescents with cannabis-related disorders.
Core Elements of CBT for Adolescent Conduct and Substance Use Problems: Comorbidity, Clinical Techniques, and Case Examples.
针对青少年品行和物质使用问题的认知行为疗法的核心要素：共病、临床技术及案例示例
Cogn Behav Pract. 2020 Nov;27(4):426-441. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2019.12.002. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
4
Chasing balance and other recommendations for improving nonparametric propensity score models.追求平衡及其他改进非参数倾向得分模型的建议。
J Causal Inference. 2017;5(2). doi: 10.1515/jci-2015-0026. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
5
Developing adaptive interventions for adolescent substance use treatment settings: protocol of an observational, mixed-methods project.为青少年物质使用治疗环境开发适应性干预措施：一项观察性、混合方法研究的方案。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2017 Dec 19;12(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13722-017-0099-4.
6
The search for relevant outcome measures for cost-utility analysis of systemic family interventions in adolescents with substance use disorder and delinquent behavior: a systematic literature review.对患有物质使用障碍和违法行为的青少年进行系统性家庭干预的成本效用分析的相关结果指标的探索：一项系统文献综述
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Sep 19;15(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0722-9.
7
Psychosocial interventions for cannabis use disorder.针对大麻使用障碍的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 5;2016(5):CD005336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005336.pub4.
8
Do improvements in substance use and mental health symptoms during treatment translate to long-term outcomes in the opposite domain?治疗期间物质使用和心理健康症状的改善是否会转化为相反领域的长期结果？
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014 Nov-Dec;47(5):339-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.06.012. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
9
Estimating the causal effects of cumulative treatment episodes for adolescents using marginal structural models and inverse probability of treatment weighting.使用边际结构模型和治疗权重的逆概率估计青少年累积治疗事件的因果效应。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Mar 1;136:69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.12.017. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
10
Assessing the generalizability of the CSAT-sponsored GAIN dataset: are the CSAT sites representative of adolescent treatment programs in the U.S.?评估 CSAT 赞助的 GAIN 数据集的泛化能力：CSAT 站点是否代表美国的青少年治疗项目？
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014 Feb;46(2):238-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.07.011. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
采用跨研究设计评估动机增强治疗-认知行为治疗 5（MET/CBT5）治疗与大麻相关障碍的青少年的疗效。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011 May;72(3):380-9. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.380.
4
Adolescent outpatient treatment and continuing care: main findings from a randomized clinical trial.青少年门诊治疗和延续护理：一项随机临床试验的主要发现。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Jul 1;110(1-2):44-54. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
5
Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning.使用机器学习改进倾向评分加权。
Stat Med. 2010 Feb 10;29(3):337-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.3782.
6
AN APPLICATION OF PRINCIPAL STRATIFICATION TO CONTROL FOR INSTITUTIONALIZATION AT FOLLOW-UP IN STUDIES OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PROGRAMS.在药物滥用治疗项目研究中，主分层在控制随访时机构收容情况方面的应用。
Ann Appl Stat. 2008 Sep 1;2(3):1034-1055. doi: 10.1214/08-AOAS179.
7
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
8
Interpreting treatment effects when cases are institutionalized after treatment.在治疗后病例被收容机构收容的情况下解读治疗效果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Jul 10;89(2-3):126-38. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.12.032. Epub 2007 Feb 1.
9
Disseminating evidence-based practices in substance abuse treatment: a review with suggestions.传播基于证据的药物滥用治疗方法：一项综述及建议
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006 Jul;31(1):25-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.03.005.
10
Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies.使用增强回归进行倾向评分估计以评估观察性研究中的因果效应。
Psychol Methods. 2004 Dec;9(4):403-25. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.403.