Schawo S, Bouwmans C, van der Schee E, Hendriks V, Brouwer W, Hakkaart L
Institute for Medical Technology Assessment & Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Parnassia Addiction Research Centre (PARC), Brijder Addiction Treatment, Parnassia Bavo Group, Monsterseweg 83, 2553 RJ, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Sep 19;15(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0722-9.
Systemic family interventions have shown to be effective in adolescents with substance use disorder and delinquent behavior. The interventions target interactions between the adolescent and involved systems (i.e. youth, family, peers, neighbors, school, work, and society). Next to effectiveness considerations, economic aspects have gained attention. However, conventional generic quality of life measures used in health economic evaluations may not be able to capture the broad effects of systemic interventions. This study aims to identify existing outcome measures, which capture the broad effects of systemic family interventions, and allow use in a health economic framework.
We based our systematic review on clinical studies in the field. Our goal was to identify effectiveness studies of psychosocial interventions for adolescents with substance use disorder and delinquent behavior and to distill the instruments used in these studies to measure effects. Searched databases were PubMed, Education Resource Information Center (ERIC), Cochrane and Psychnet (PsycBOOKSc, PsycCRITIQUES, print). Identified instruments were ranked according to the number of systems covered (comprehensiveness). In addition, their use for health economic analyses was evaluated according to suitability characteristics such as brevity, accessibility, psychometric properties, etc.
One thousand three hundred seventy-eight articles were found and screened for eligibility. Eighty articles were selected, 8 instruments were identified covering 5 or more systems.
The systematic review identified instruments from the clinical field suitable to evaluate systemic family interventions in a health economic framework. None of them had preference-weights available. Hence, a next step could be to attach preference-weights to one of the identified instruments to allow health economic evaluations of systemic family interventions.
系统性家庭干预已被证明对患有物质使用障碍和犯罪行为的青少年有效。这些干预针对青少年与相关系统(即青少年自身、家庭、同龄人、邻居、学校、工作场所和社会)之间的互动。除了有效性考量外,经济方面也受到了关注。然而,健康经济评估中使用的传统通用生活质量测量方法可能无法捕捉系统性干预的广泛影响。本研究旨在识别现有的结果测量方法,这些方法能够捕捉系统性家庭干预的广泛影响,并可用于健康经济框架。
我们基于该领域的临床研究进行系统综述。我们的目标是识别针对患有物质使用障碍和犯罪行为的青少年的心理社会干预的有效性研究,并提炼这些研究中用于测量效果的工具。检索的数据库有PubMed、教育资源信息中心(ERIC)、Cochrane和Psychnet(PsycBOOKSc、PsycCRITIQUES,印刷版)。根据所涵盖系统的数量(全面性)对识别出的工具进行排名。此外,根据简洁性、可及性、心理测量特性等适用性特征评估它们在健康经济分析中的用途。
共找到1378篇文章并筛选其 eligibility。选出80篇文章,识别出8种涵盖5个或更多系统的工具。
该系统综述识别出了临床领域中适用于在健康经济框架内评估系统性家庭干预的工具。其中没有一个工具具有偏好权重。因此,下一步可以是为其中一个识别出的工具赋予偏好权重,以便对系统性家庭干预进行健康经济评估。