Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jul 1;37(15):1340-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318246a53a.
Retrospective analysis.
The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of using an automated approach to administrative claims data to assess the rate and risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) in spinal procedures.
SSI is a major indicator of health care quality. A wide range of SSI rates have been proposed in the literature depending on clinical setting and procedure type.
All spinal surgeries performed at a university-affiliated tertiary-care center from July 2005 to December 2010 were identified using diagnosis-related group, current procedural terminology, and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes and were validated through chart review. Rates of SSI and associated risk factors were calculated using univariate regression analysis. Odds ratios were calculated through multivariate logistic regression.
A total of 6628 hospital visits were identified. The cumulative incidence of SSI was 2.9%. Procedural risk factors associated with a statistically significant increase in rates of infection were the following: sacral involvement (9.6%), fusions greater than 7 levels (7.8%), fusions greater than 12 levels (10.4%), cases with an osteotomy (6.5%), operative time longer than 5 hours (5.1%), transfusions of red blood cells (5.0%), serum (7.4%), and autologous blood (4.1%). Patient-based risk factors included anemia (4.3%), diabetes mellitus (4.2%), coronary artery disease (4.7%), diagnosis of coagulopathy (7.8%), and bone or connective tissue neoplasm (5.0%).
Used individually, diagnosis-related group, current procedural terminology, and ICD-9 codes cannot completely capture a patient population. Using an algorithm combining all 3 coding systems to generate both inclusion and exclusion criteria, we were able to analyze a specific population of spinal surgery patients within a high-volume medical center. Within that group, risk factors found to increase infection rates were isolated and can serve to focus hospital-wide efforts to decrease surgery-related morbidity and improve patient outcomes.
回顾性分析。
本研究旨在探讨使用自动化方法处理行政索赔数据来评估脊柱手术中手术部位感染(SSI)发生率和风险因素的准确性。
SSI 是医疗质量的一个主要指标。根据临床环境和手术类型的不同,文献中提出了广泛的 SSI 发生率范围。
通过诊断相关组、当前程序术语和国际疾病分类第 9 版(ICD-9)代码,确定了 2005 年 7 月至 2010 年 12 月在一所大学附属医院进行的所有脊柱手术,并通过病历回顾进行验证。使用单变量回归分析计算 SSI 的发生率和相关风险因素。通过多变量逻辑回归计算比值比。
共确定了 6628 例住院就诊。SSI 的累积发生率为 2.9%。与感染率显著增加相关的手术风险因素包括:骶骨受累(9.6%)、融合超过 7 个节段(7.8%)、融合超过 12 个节段(10.4%)、有截骨术的病例(6.5%)、手术时间超过 5 小时(5.1%)、输红细胞(5.0%)、血清(7.4%)和自体血(4.1%)。患者相关风险因素包括贫血(4.3%)、糖尿病(4.2%)、冠状动脉疾病(4.7%)、凝血功能障碍诊断(7.8%)和骨或结缔组织肿瘤(5.0%)。
单独使用诊断相关组、当前程序术语和 ICD-9 代码无法完全捕获患者人群。通过使用结合所有 3 种编码系统的算法生成纳入和排除标准,我们能够分析高容量医疗中心内特定的脊柱手术患者群体。在该组中,发现增加感染率的风险因素被孤立出来,可以集中医院资源努力降低手术相关发病率并改善患者结局。