• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于美国职业治疗协会(AOTA)实地考察评估的学生期望不断提高。

Progressive student expectations based on AOTA's fieldwork evaluation.

作者信息

Jas-Weathers T

机构信息

Occupational Therapy Division, Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio 45220.

出版信息

Am J Occup Ther. 1990 Sep;44(9):848-51. doi: 10.5014/ajot.44.9.848.

DOI:10.5014/ajot.44.9.848
PMID:2221005
Abstract

Behavioral statements for each item of the FWE were developed according to a developmental learning hierarchy and then organized into specific categories and time frames. The performance expectations are presented to occupational therapy students in Level II fieldwork in the areas of psychiatry and physical disabilities; a similar process was used to develop performance expectations for the Level II fieldwork of those studying to be occupational therapy assistants. The advantages of this system over the system we had used previously were readily apparent: Supervisor preparation time was considerably reduced, and the content and format of the supervisory meetings changed. Meetings are now spent productively discussing strengths and patterns of behaviors, rather than reviewing endless lists of behavioral statements.

摘要

FWE各项目的行为陈述是根据发展学习层次制定的,然后被组织成特定的类别和时间框架。绩效期望呈现给从事精神病学和身体残疾领域二级实习的职业治疗专业学生;采用了类似的过程来制定对职业治疗助理专业学生二级实习的绩效期望。与我们之前使用的系统相比,这个系统的优势显而易见:主管的准备时间大幅减少,督导会议的内容和形式也发生了变化。现在的会议能够卓有成效地讨论行为优势和模式,而不是审查冗长的行为陈述清单。

相似文献

1
Progressive student expectations based on AOTA's fieldwork evaluation.基于美国职业治疗协会(AOTA)实地考察评估的学生期望不断提高。
Am J Occup Ther. 1990 Sep;44(9):848-51. doi: 10.5014/ajot.44.9.848.
2
A prediction model of performance in level II fieldwork in physical disabilities.
Am J Occup Ther. 1994 Oct;48(10):926-31. doi: 10.5014/ajot.48.10.926.
3
Level I fieldwork: creating a positive experience.一级实地考察:创造积极体验。
Am J Occup Ther. 1993 Jan;47(1):68-73. doi: 10.5014/ajot.47.1.68.
4
Student level II fieldwork failure: strategies for intervention.
Am J Occup Ther. 1998 Feb;52(2):143-9. doi: 10.5014/ajot.52.2.143.
5
The Revised American Occupational Therapy Association Fieldwork Performance Evaluations: Evaluation of Content Validity-Part 1.美国作业治疗协会修订版实习表现评估:内容效度评估-第 1 部分。
Am J Occup Ther. 2020 Nov/Dec;74(6):7406205090p1-7406205090p13. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2020.044180.
6
Agency practices in assigning fieldwork experiences to occupational therapy students.
Am J Occup Ther. 1982 Jul;36(7):450-5. doi: 10.5014/ajot.36.7.450.
7
A time study of staff and student activities in a level II fieldwork program.
Am J Occup Ther. 1985 Jan;39(1):35-40. doi: 10.5014/ajot.39.1.35.
8
Clinical teaching: fieldwork supervisors' attitudes and values.临床教学:实地工作督导员的态度和价值观。
Am J Occup Ther. 1990 Sep;44(9):835-8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.44.9.835.
9
A group approach to mental health fieldwork.一种心理健康实地考察的小组方法。
Am J Occup Ther. 1995 Apr;49(4):354-8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.49.4.354.
10
Level I fieldwork today: A study of contexts and perceptions.今日一级实地考察:关于背景与认知的一项研究。
Am J Occup Ther. 2006 May-Jun;60(3):275-87. doi: 10.5014/ajot.60.3.275.