• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贲门失弛缓症的气动扩张:在长期随访中评估反应和与复发相关的因素时,降低食管下括约肌压力。

Pneumatic dilation for achalasia cardia: reduction in lower esophageal sphincter pressure in assessing response and factors associated with recurrence during long-term follow up.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.

出版信息

Dig Endosc. 2012 Jan;24(1):7-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01159.x. Epub 2011 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01159.x
PMID:22211406
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data on utility of post-pneumatic dilation (PD) lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure measurement in evaluating short and long-term efficacy of dilation, which tears the non-relaxing LES in achalasia, are scanty.

METHODS

Post-PD LES pressure was measured in 72/98 patients with achalasia. The best cut-off pressure classifying responders and non-responders was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Factors associated with non-response and recurrence were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 98 patients (41.1 ± 13.3 years, 58 male), 75 improved, three had perforation requiring surgery, and 20 did not respond to the first PD session. Of 18/20 patients undergoing a second PD, 11 improved and six non-responders needed myotomy. 37/58 (71%) male and 17/40 (42.5%) female patients had a first PD with a 35-mm balloon (P = 0.03). Age and gender of patients did not influence outcome. LES pressure was lower in responders or in those having recurrence than in non-responders (17 mmHg [6.4-75], 11 mmHg [4.6-31]vs 25 mmHg [13-55]). On the ROC curve, 22.5 mmHg was the best cut-off value differentiating responders and non-responders (area under curve [AUC] 0.73). Of the 86 patients responding to PD, 20 had recurrence. Patients who responded to one session of PD or had LES pressure <10 mmHg after the procedure recurred less often, although there was no relationship with age and gender.

CONCLUSION

Post-PD LES pressure measurement is useful to assess treatment response. Patients responding to the first session and those with post-PD LES pressure <10 mmHg tended to recur less. Age and gender did not influence outcome, which might be related to preferential use of a 35-mm balloon, particularly for male patients, during the first session.

摘要

背景

在评估扩张术的短期和长期疗效方面,关于扩张术(PD)后食管下括约肌(LES)压力测量在非弛缓性贲门失弛缓症中的作用的数据很少。

方法

对 98 例贲门失弛缓症患者进行 PD 后 LES 压力测量。通过接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线确定将反应者和非反应者分类的最佳截断压力。评估与非反应和复发相关的因素。

结果

98 例患者(41.1 ± 13.3 岁,58 例男性)中,75 例患者症状改善,3 例患者发生穿孔需手术治疗,20 例患者对首次 PD 治疗无反应。在 18/20 例接受第二次 PD 的患者中,11 例患者症状改善,6 例非反应者需要肌切开术。58 例男性中有 37 例(71%)和 40 例女性中有 17 例(42.5%)患者使用 35mm 球囊进行首次 PD(P = 0.03)。患者的年龄和性别并不影响治疗效果。与非反应者相比,反应者或复发者的 LES 压力更低(17mmHg[6.4-75]、11mmHg[4.6-31]vs25mmHg[13-55])。在 ROC 曲线中,22.5mmHg 是区分反应者和非反应者的最佳截断值(曲线下面积[AUC]为 0.73)。在对 PD 有反应的 86 例患者中,有 20 例复发。仅对一次 PD 治疗有反应或治疗后 LES 压力<10mmHg 的患者复发频率较低,尽管与年龄和性别无关。

结论

PD 后 LES 压力测量有助于评估治疗反应。首次治疗后有反应和 PD 后 LES 压力<10mmHg 的患者复发频率较低。年龄和性别不影响治疗效果,这可能与首次治疗时优先使用 35mm 球囊有关,尤其是对男性患者。

相似文献

1
Pneumatic dilation for achalasia cardia: reduction in lower esophageal sphincter pressure in assessing response and factors associated with recurrence during long-term follow up.贲门失弛缓症的气动扩张:在长期随访中评估反应和与复发相关的因素时,降低食管下括约肌压力。
Dig Endosc. 2012 Jan;24(1):7-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01159.x. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
2
Long-term follow-up after pneumatic dilation for achalasia cardia: factors associated with treatment failure and recurrence.贲门失弛缓症气囊扩张术后的长期随访:与治疗失败和复发相关的因素
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Dec;99(12):2304-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40099.x.
3
High-resolution manometry is comparable to timed barium esophagogram for assessing response to pneumatic dilation in patients with achalasia.高分辨率测压法在评估贲门失弛缓症患者气囊扩张反应方面与定时钡餐食管造影相当。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar;34(2):144-51. doi: 10.1007/s12664-015-0551-x. Epub 2015 Apr 26.
4
Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs other achalasia treatments in improving esophageal function.经口内镜下肌切开术与其他贲门失弛缓症治疗方法在改善食管功能方面的疗效比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 May 28;22(20):4918-25. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i20.4918.
5
Change in cross-sectional area of esophageal muscle does not correlate with the outcome of achalasia after pneumatic balloon dilatation.经皮球囊扩张治疗贲门失弛缓症后,食管肌层横截面积的变化与疗效无关。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Mar;25(3):539-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06108.x.
6
Balloon dilation of the esophago-gastric junction affects lower and upper esophageal sphincter function in achalasia.球囊扩张食管胃结合部影响贲门失弛缓症的下食管括约肌和上食管括约肌功能。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Jan;26(1):69-76. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12228. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
7
Effects of pneumatic dilation and myotomy on esophageal function and morphology in patients with achalasia.气囊扩张术和肌切开术对贲门失弛缓症患者食管功能和形态的影响。
Am Surg. 2005 Feb;71(2):128-31.
8
Esophageal motility differences among aged patients with achalasia: a Taiwan report.老年贲门失弛缓症患者的食管动力差异:一份台湾地区报告。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Nov;22(11):1737-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04720.x.
9
[Long-term results for Heller-myotomy with anterior semifundoplication in achalasia].[贲门失弛缓症行赫勒肌切开术加前半胃底折叠术的长期疗效]
Zentralbl Chir. 2004 Oct;129(5):374-80. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-820373.
10
[Pneumatic dilatation of achalasia: local experience in treating 41 patients].[贲门失弛缓症的气囊扩张术:治疗41例患者的本地经验]
J Med Liban. 2007 Jan-Mar;55(1):15-8.

引用本文的文献

1
[Sex/Gender Differences in Esophageal Motility Disorders].[食管动力障碍中的性别差异]
Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res. 2024 Sep;24(3):298-300. doi: 10.7704/kjhugr.2024.0037. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
2
True peristaltic recovery is uncommon following treatment, particularly endoscopic dilation for achalasia cardia, though pseudo-recovery often occurs.真性蠕动功能恢复在治疗后并不常见,尤其是贲门失弛缓症的内镜扩张治疗,尽管假性恢复常常发生。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2023 Aug;42(4):549-557. doi: 10.1007/s12664-023-01372-6. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
3
Correlation between Lower Esophageal Sphincter Metrics on High-Resolution Manometry and the Clinical Presentation of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Achalasia.
高分辨率测压下食管下括约肌指标与新诊断贲门失弛缓症患者临床表现之间的相关性
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;13(6):1136. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061136.
4
Integrated Relaxation Pressure (IRP) Distinguishes between Reflux-Predominant and Dysphagia-Predominant Phenotypes of Esophageal "Absent Contractility".综合松弛压(IRP)可区分食管“无收缩力”的反流为主型和吞咽困难为主型表型。
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 25;11(21):6287. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216287.
5
Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs pneumatic dilation (PD) in treatment of achalasia: A meta-analysis of studies with ≥ 12-month follow-up.经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)与气囊扩张术(PD)治疗贲门失弛缓症的比较:对随访时间≥12个月的研究的荟萃分析
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Jul;9(7):E1097-E1107. doi: 10.1055/a-1483-9406. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
6
Retrospective study on symptoms and treatment modalities used and short-term follow up of achalasia cardia in Indian setting.印度贲门失弛缓症症状、治疗方式及短期随访的回顾性研究
JGH Open. 2020 Mar 24;4(5):856-859. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12328. eCollection 2020 Oct.
7
2019 Seoul Consensus on Esophageal Achalasia Guidelines.《2019年首尔贲门失弛缓症指南共识》
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 Apr 30;26(2):180-203. doi: 10.5056/jnm20014.
8
High-resolution manometry is comparable to timed barium esophagogram for assessing response to pneumatic dilation in patients with achalasia.高分辨率测压法在评估贲门失弛缓症患者气囊扩张反应方面与定时钡餐食管造影相当。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar;34(2):144-51. doi: 10.1007/s12664-015-0551-x. Epub 2015 Apr 26.
9
Recent trends in endoscopic management of achalasia.贲门失弛缓症内镜治疗的近期趋势
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Sep 16;6(9):407-14. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i9.407.
10
Association between gastroesophageal reflux disease after pneumatic balloon dilatation and clinical course in patients with achalasia.气囊扩张治疗贲门失弛缓症后胃食管反流病与临床病程的关系。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Apr 30;20(2):212-8. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2014.20.2.212.