Suppr超能文献

运用批判实在论理解健康决策:慢性肾脏病期间的家庭透析决策。

Understanding health decisions using critical realism: home-dialysis decision-making during chronic kidney disease.

机构信息

London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Nurs Inq. 2012 Mar;19(1):29-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00575.x. Epub 2011 Jul 27.

Abstract

Understanding health decisions using critical realism: home-dialysis decision-making during chronic kidney disease This paper examines home-dialysis decision making in people with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) from the perspective of critical realism. CKD programmes focus on patient education for self-management to delay the progression of kidney disease and the preparation and support for renal replacement therapy e.g.) dialysis and transplantation. Home-dialysis has clear health, societal and economic benefits yet service usage is low despite efforts to realign resources and educate individuals. Current research on the determinants of modality selection is superficial and insufficient to capture the complexities embedded in the process of dialysis modality selection. Predictors of home-dialysis selection and the effect of chronic kidney disease educational programmes provide a limited explanation of this experience. A re-conceptualization of the problem is required in order to fully understand this process. The epistemology and ontology of critical realism guides our knowledge and methodology particularly suited for examination of these complexities. This approach examines the deeper mechanisms and wider determinants associated with modality decision making, specifically who chooses home dialysis and under what circumstances. Until more is known regarding dialysis modality decision making service usage of home dialysis will remain low as interventions will be based on inadequate epistemology.

摘要

运用批判实在论理解健康决策

慢性肾脏病中的居家透析决策 本论文从批判实在论的角度审视了慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的居家透析决策。CKD 计划侧重于患者的自我管理教育,以延缓肾脏疾病的进展,并为肾脏替代治疗(如透析和移植)做好准备和提供支持。尽管已经努力重新配置资源和对个人进行教育,但居家透析具有明显的健康、社会和经济效益,但使用率却很低。尽管目前对决定透析模式选择的因素进行了研究,但这些研究还不够深入,无法捕捉到透析模式选择过程中所包含的复杂性。居家透析选择的预测因素和慢性肾脏病教育计划的效果,对这一体验的解释也很有限。为了全面理解这一过程,需要对问题进行重新概念化。批判实在论的认识论和本体论指导着我们的知识和方法,特别适合于对这些复杂性进行研究。这种方法考察了与模式决策相关的更深层次的机制和更广泛的决定因素,特别是谁选择居家透析以及在什么情况下选择。在我们对透析模式决策有更多的了解之前,居家透析的服务使用率仍将保持较低水平,因为干预措施将基于不充分的认识论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验