Health Sciences Education and Research Commons, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
J Interprof Care. 2012 Mar;26(2):108-14. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2011.640758. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
This paper examines the readiness for and attitudes toward interprofessional (IP) education in students across four diverse educational institutions with different educational mandates. The four educational institutions (research-intensive university, baccalaureate, polytechnical institute and community college) partnered to develop, deliver and evaluate IP modules in simulation learning environments. As one of the first steps in planning, the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale was delivered to 1530 students from across the institutions. A confirmatory factor analysis was used to expand upon previous work to examine psychometric properties of the instrument. An analysis of variance revealed significant differences among the institutions; however, a closer examination of the means demonstrated little variability. In an environment where collaboration and development of learning experiences across educational institutions is an expectation of the provincial government, an understanding of differences among a cohort of students is critical. This study reveals nonmeaningful significant differences, indicating different institutional educational mandates are unlikely to be an obstacle in the development of cross-institutional IP curricula.
本文考察了来自四个不同教育机构的学生对跨专业(IP)教育的准备情况和态度,这四个教育机构具有不同的教育任务。这四个教育机构(研究型大学、学士学位、理工学院和社区学院)合作开发、提供和评估模拟学习环境中的 IP 模块。作为规划的第一步,在整个机构中向 1530 名学生发放了跨专业学习准备量表。使用验证性因素分析对该工具的心理测量特性进行了扩展研究。方差分析显示各机构之间存在显著差异;然而,对均值的更仔细检查表明差异很小。在一个跨教育机构合作和发展学习经验是省政府期望的环境中,了解学生群体之间的差异至关重要。本研究揭示了无意义的显著差异,表明不同的机构教育任务不太可能成为跨机构 IP 课程发展的障碍。