Center for Geomicrobiology, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114-116 Build. 1540, Aarhus C, DK-8000, Denmark.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2012 Jan 15;26(1):32-6. doi: 10.1002/rcm.5290.
The stable carbon isotopic ratio of methane (δ(13)C-CH(4)) recovered from marine sediments containing gas hydrate is often used to infer the gas source and associated microbial processes. This is a powerful approach because of distinct isotopic fractionation patterns associated with methane production by biogenic and thermogenic pathways and microbial oxidation. However, isotope fractionations due to physical processes, such as hydrate dissolution, have not been fully evaluated. We have conducted experiments to determine if hydrate dissolution or dissociation (two distinct physical processes) results in isotopic fractionation. In a pressure chamber, hydrate was formed from a methane gas source at 2.5 MPa and 4 °C, well within the hydrate stability field. Following formation, the methane source was removed while maintaining the hydrate at the same pressure and temperature which stimulated hydrate dissolution. Over the duration of two dissolution experiments (each ~20-30 days), water and headspace samples were periodically collected and measured for methane concentrations and δ(13)C-CH(4) while the hydrate dissolved. For both experiments, the methane concentrations in the pressure chamber water and headspace increased over time, indicating that the hydrate was dissolving, but the δ(13)C-CH(4) values showed no significant trend and remained constant, within 0.5‰. This lack of isotope change over time indicates that there is no fractionation during hydrate dissolution. We also investigated previous findings that little isotopic fractionation occurs when the gas hydrate dissociates into gas bubbles and water due to the release of pressure. Over a 2.5 MPa pressure drop, the difference in the δ(13)C-CH(4) was <0.3‰. We have therefore confirmed that there is no isotope fractionation when the gas hydrate dissociates and demonstrated that there is no fractionation when the hydrate dissolves. Therefore, measured δ(13)C-CH(4) values near gas hydrates are not affected by physical processes, and can thus be interpreted to result from either the gas source or associated microbial processes.
从含有天然气水合物的海洋沉积物中回收的甲烷(δ(13)C-CH(4))稳定碳同位素比值通常用于推断气体来源和相关微生物过程。这是一种强大的方法,因为与生物和热成因途径以及微生物氧化相关的甲烷生产有明显的同位素分馏模式。然而,由于物理过程(例如水合物溶解)引起的同位素分馏尚未得到充分评估。我们进行了实验以确定水合物溶解或分解(两个不同的物理过程)是否会导致同位素分馏。在压力室中,在 2.5 MPa 和 4°C 的温度下从甲烷气源中形成水合物,这很好地处于水合物稳定场中。形成后,在保持水合物处于相同压力和温度的情况下去除甲烷气源,这刺激了水合物溶解。在两个溶解实验(每个实验持续约 20-30 天)的过程中,定期收集水和顶空样品,并测量甲烷浓度和 δ(13)C-CH(4),同时水合物溶解。对于两个实验,压力室内水和顶空的甲烷浓度随时间增加,表明水合物正在溶解,但 δ(13)C-CH(4)值没有明显趋势,保持不变,在 0.5‰ 以内。随着时间的推移,这种同位素没有变化表明水合物溶解过程中没有分馏。我们还研究了先前的发现,即由于压力释放,天然气水合物分解成气泡和水时几乎不会发生同位素分馏。在 2.5 MPa 的压降下,δ(13)C-CH(4)的差异<0.3‰。因此,我们已经证实当气体水合物分解时没有同位素分馏,并且当水合物溶解时也没有分馏。因此,在气体水合物附近测量的 δ(13)C-CH(4)值不受物理过程的影响,因此可以解释为气体来源或相关微生物过程的结果。