Suppr超能文献

腹部伤口缝合中保留缝线平行放置与垂直放置的比较。

A comparison of parallel versus perpendicular placement of retention sutures in abdominal wound closure.

作者信息

Rappaport W, Allen R, Chvapil M, Benson D, Putnam C

机构信息

University of Arizona Medical Center, Tucson 85724.

出版信息

Am Surg. 1990 Oct;56(10):618-23.

PMID:2221612
Abstract

A new technique for placement of retention sutures is described. Twenty-five rats underwent midline laparotomy incision. The control group was closed with traditional placement of through-and-through retention sutures placed in a perpendicular direction to the wound. The experimental group was closed with retention sutures placed in a parallel direction to the wound as described below. Wound bursting strength was significantly (P less than 0.001) greater at one to five days in the experimental group compared with the control animals. In addition, inflammatory reaction and pressure necrosis were greater in the control group. It appears that parallel placement of sutures has less of a tendency to cut through tissue when subjected to the distracting forces on a midline wound.

摘要

本文描述了一种放置保留缝线的新技术。25只大鼠接受了中线剖腹切口手术。对照组采用传统的贯穿式保留缝线进行缝合,缝线与伤口垂直放置。实验组则按照如下所述,采用与伤口平行的保留缝线进行缝合。与对照组动物相比,实验组在术后1至5天的伤口破裂强度显著更高(P小于0.001)。此外,对照组的炎症反应和压迫性坏死更为严重。当受到中线伤口上的牵拉力时,缝线平行放置似乎较少有切割组织的倾向。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验