• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹部伤口缝合。聚二氧六环酮、聚丙烯和涂有特氟龙的编织涤纶缝线的比较。

Abdominal wound closure. A comparison of polydioxanone, polypropylene, and Teflon-coated braided Dacron sutures.

作者信息

Kon N D, Meredith J W, Poole G V, Martin M B, Kawamoto E, Myers R T

出版信息

Am Surg. 1984 Oct;50(10):549-51.

PMID:6237599
Abstract

A midline abdominal wound was made in 135 Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats, and the fascia was then closed by the continuous suture technique with 4-0 absorbable monofilament polydioxanone sutures (n = 45 rats), 4-0 permanent monofilament polypropylene sutures (n = 45 rats), or 4-0 Teflon-coated braided Dacron sutures (n = 45 rats). At 1-, 2-, and 6-month intervals, wound-bursting pressures were determined in 15 animals from each group. At 1 month and at 6 months, there was no significant difference in wound-bursting strength among the three types of sutures. At 2 months, wounds closed with Teflon-coated braided Dacron were significantly stronger than wounds closed with the other types of sutures. In most of the braided Dacron suture animals, the fascia burst in areas other than the abdominal wound, indicating that the wound was stronger at that time than was the surrounding fascia. There is no advantage to that added strength, and braided Dacron sutures have been shown to cause greater tissue reaction than monofilament sutures. Therefore, except in patients with poor wound healing who are highly susceptible to dehiscence and in whom permanent low-tissue-reaction sutures may be beneficial, the authors recommend a running suture technique using absorbable monofilament suture, such as polydioxanone, for the routine closure of clean abdominal wounds.

摘要

在135只Harlan Sprague-Dawley大鼠身上制作腹部正中切口,然后分别用4-0可吸收单丝聚二氧六环酮缝线(45只大鼠)、4-0永久性单丝聚丙烯缝线(45只大鼠)或4-0特氟龙涂层编织达克隆缝线(45只大鼠)通过连续缝合技术关闭筋膜。在1个月、2个月和6个月的时间间隔,每组选取15只动物测定伤口破裂压力。在1个月和6个月时,三种缝线类型的伤口破裂强度无显著差异。在2个月时,用特氟龙涂层编织达克隆缝线缝合的伤口明显比用其他类型缝线缝合的伤口更强。在大多数使用编织达克隆缝线的动物中,筋膜在腹部伤口以外的区域破裂,这表明此时伤口比周围的筋膜更强。这种额外的强度并无益处,而且已表明编织达克隆缝线比单丝缝线会引起更大的组织反应。因此,除了伤口愈合不良、极易发生裂开且使用永久性低组织反应缝线可能有益的患者外,作者建议对于清洁腹部伤口的常规缝合采用连续缝合技术,使用可吸收单丝缝线,如聚二氧六环酮。

相似文献

1
Abdominal wound closure. A comparison of polydioxanone, polypropylene, and Teflon-coated braided Dacron sutures.腹部伤口缝合。聚二氧六环酮、聚丙烯和涂有特氟龙的编织涤纶缝线的比较。
Am Surg. 1984 Oct;50(10):549-51.
2
Suture technique and wound-bursting strength.缝合技术与伤口抗破裂强度。
Am Surg. 1984 Oct;50(10):569-72.
3
Mechanical and handling properties of braided polyblend polyethylene sutures in comparison to braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures.与编织聚酯和单丝聚二氧六环酮缝线相比,编织聚混物聚乙烯缝线的机械性能和操作性能
Arthroscopy. 2006 Nov;22(11):1146-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.06.013.
4
A randomised comparison of polydioxanone (PDS) and polypropylene (Prolene) for abdominal wound closure.聚对二氧环己酮(PDS)与聚丙烯(普理灵)用于腹部伤口闭合的随机对照比较。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1987 May;69(3):113-5.
5
A comparison of parallel versus perpendicular placement of retention sutures in abdominal wound closure.腹部伤口缝合中保留缝线平行放置与垂直放置的比较。
Am Surg. 1990 Oct;56(10):618-23.
6
Primary abdominal wound closure with permanent, continuous running monofilament sutures.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981 Nov;153(5):721-2.
7
Tensile strength of surgical knots in abdominal wound closure.腹部伤口缝合中手术结的抗张强度。
ANZ J Surg. 2008 Mar;78(3):164-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04394.x.
8
Comparison between absorbable and nonabsorbable, monofilament sutures for end-to-end arterial anastomoses in growing pigs.
Surgery. 1984 Feb;95(2):202-8.
9
Polydioxanone (PDS), a novel monofilament synthetic absorbable suture.聚二氧六环酮(PDS),一种新型的单丝合成可吸收缝线。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981 Oct;153(4):497-507.
10
[Growth of the aortic anastomosis in puppies--comparison of monofilament suture materials, whether absorbable or nonabsorbable, and of suture techniques, whether continuous or interrupted].[幼犬主动脉吻合口的生长——可吸收或不可吸收单丝缝合材料以及连续或间断缝合技术的比较]
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1991 Feb;92(2):206-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Running closure of clean and contaminated abdominal wounds using a synthetic monofilament absorbable looped suture.使用合成单丝可吸收环形缝线对清洁和污染的腹部伤口进行连续缝合。
Surg Today. 1999;29(9):874-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02482778.
2
[Ligament replacement with polydioxanone (PDS)].[用聚二氧六环酮(PDS)进行韧带置换]
Unfallchirurgie. 1985 Oct;11(5):264-73. doi: 10.1007/BF02587975.