University of Barcelona, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 May;41(5):1043-6. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr181. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of extended cervical mediastinoscopy (ECM) in the staging of bronchogenic carcinoma (BC) of the left lung based on our updated experience.
From 1998 to 2003, 89 patients underwent routine ECM for staging of BC of the left lung. In 2004, routine positron emission tomography (PET) was included in our staging protocol and ECM was reserved for those with positive mediastinal or hilar PET images, large lymph nodes on computed tomography (CT) scan or central tumours. Following this protocol, from 2004 to 2010, we performed 132 selective ECM. ECM was considered positive when metastatic nodes or tumour involvement directly in the subaortic or para-aortic regions was confirmed pathologically. Patients with negative ECM underwent subsequent thoracotomy for tumour resection and systematic nodal dissection (SND).
Two hundred and twenty-one ECMs were performed from 1998 to 2010 (89 routine and 132 selective). In the routine ECM protocol, four cases were positive and thoracotomy was contraindicated. The remaining 85 patients were operated and five had nodal disease in subaortic (LN5) or para-aortic (LN6) stations. In the selective ECM protocol (n = 188), 132 patients underwent ECM and in 19 it was positive; the remaining 113 patients underwent thoracotomy and SND found involved LN5 or LN6 in six patients; the other 56 patients underwent direct thoracotomy and four had positive LN5 or LN6. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of ECM were 0.67, 1, 1, 0.94 and 0.95, respectively. The staging values of routine/selective ECM protocols were 0.44/0.65, 1/1, 1/1, 0.94/0.94 and 0.94/0.95, respectively.
Selective ECM protocol according to CT and PET findings has high negative predictive value and accuracy. Therefore, its selective use is recommended because it saves around 30% ECM without decreasing staging values of the current protocol.
本研究旨在根据我们的最新经验,评估扩展式颈纵隔镜检查(ECM)在左侧肺癌分期中的准确性。
1998 年至 2003 年,89 例患者接受了常规 ECM 以分期左侧肺癌。2004 年,我们的分期方案中纳入了常规正电子发射断层扫描(PET),并将 ECM 保留给纵隔或肺门 PET 图像阳性、CT 扫描显示大淋巴结或中央肿瘤的患者。按照这一方案,2004 年至 2010 年,我们进行了 132 例选择性 ECM。当经病理证实主动脉下或主动脉旁区域的转移性淋巴结或肿瘤直接累及时,ECM 被认为是阳性。ECM 阴性的患者随后接受了肿瘤切除和系统淋巴结清扫(SND)的开胸手术。
1998 年至 2010 年共进行了 221 例 ECM(89 例常规和 132 例选择性)。在常规 ECM 方案中,4 例为阳性,开胸手术被禁忌。其余 85 例患者接受了手术,5 例主动脉下(LN5)或主动脉旁(LN6)淋巴结有疾病。在选择性 ECM 方案(n=188)中,132 例患者接受了 ECM,其中 19 例为阳性;其余 113 例患者接受了开胸手术和 SND,6 例患者发现 LN5 或 LN6 受累;其余 56 例患者直接开胸,4 例患者 LN5 或 LN6 阳性。ECM 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为 0.67、1、1、0.94 和 0.95。常规/选择性 ECM 方案的分期值分别为 0.44/0.65、1/1、1/1、0.94/0.94 和 0.94/0.95。
根据 CT 和 PET 检查结果选择的 ECM 具有高阴性预测值和准确性。因此,建议选择性使用,因为它可以节省约 30%的 ECM,而不会降低当前方案的分期价值。