• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison between carotid stenting and carotid endarterectomy in early outcome.

作者信息

Kovacić Slavica, Kovacević Miljenko, Strenja-Linić Ines, Budiselić Berislav, Knezević Sinisa

机构信息

Rijeka University Hospital Center, Department of Radiology, Rijeka, Croatia.

出版信息

Coll Antropol. 2011 Sep;35 Suppl 2:271-4.

PMID:22220451
Abstract

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a widely used method in prevention of stroke for carotid artery stenosis as an alternative to surgical treatment. Initial studies reveal higher morbidity and mortality rates for CAS than acceptable standards for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The aim of this study was to compare results in a series of CAS with concurrent risk-matched group of CEA patients. The study included two groups of 50 patients with internal carotid artery stenosis. We compared early outcome (30 days after procedure) in risk-matched groups of patients that underwent these procedures. Post procedural complications were equally frequent in both groups. There was no significant difference in perioperative complication rates (P = 0.871). Comparison of these two methods shows that CAS and CEA are competitive methods for treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Particularly in symptomatic patients with high risk for surgery CAS is alternative treatment.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison between carotid stenting and carotid endarterectomy in early outcome.
Coll Antropol. 2011 Sep;35 Suppl 2:271-4.
2
Analysis of Florida and New York state hospital discharges suggests that carotid stenting in symptomatic women is associated with significant increase in mortality and perioperative morbidity compared with carotid endarterectomy.对佛罗里达州和纽约州医院出院患者的分析表明,与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,症状性女性颈动脉支架置入术与死亡率和围手术期发病率显著增加相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Aug;56(2):334-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.066. Epub 2012 May 12.
3
Outcome of carotid artery stenting for primary versus restenotic lesions.原发性病变与再狭窄病变的颈动脉支架置入术结果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 May-Jun;23(3):330-4. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
4
Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting: introduction of a new technique into an established vascular surgery center.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术:将一项新技术引入一家成熟的血管外科中心。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2009 Apr-May;43(2):144-9. doi: 10.1177/1538574408327571. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
5
Long-term prevention of stroke: a modern comparison of current carotid stenting and carotid endarterectomy.长期预防中风:当前颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的现代比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 8;57(6):664-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.041.
6
Thirty day results of 227 consecutive carotid stent procedures performed in carotid stenting clinical trials.227 例连续颈动脉支架置入术临床试验 30 天结果。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2009 Dec;1(2):154-8. doi: 10.1136/jnis.2009.001339. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
7
Carotid angioplasty in asymptomatic patients undergoing CABG surgery.在接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)手术的无症状患者中进行颈动脉血管成形术。
Int Angiol. 2010 Jun;29(3):239-43.
8
Outcomes of carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis: a single neurovascular center retrospective review of 101 consecutive patients.颈动脉狭窄高危患者颈动脉支架置入术的结果:单神经血管中心 101 例连续患者的回顾性研究。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Mar;66(3):448-53; discussion 453-4. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000365008.17803.AD.
9
[Comparison of early complications in treatment of carotid artery stenosis with carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting].颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄的早期并发症比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Mar;25(3):337-40.
10
Safety of latest-generation self-expanding stents in patients with NASCET-ineligible severe symptomatic extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.新一代自膨式支架在不符合北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术(NASCET)标准的重度症状性颅外颈内动脉狭窄患者中的安全性
Arch Neurol. 2004 Jan;61(1):39-43. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.1.39.