• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

227 例连续颈动脉支架置入术临床试验 30 天结果。

Thirty day results of 227 consecutive carotid stent procedures performed in carotid stenting clinical trials.

机构信息

Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Neurointerv Surg. 2009 Dec;1(2):154-8. doi: 10.1136/jnis.2009.001339. Epub 2009 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1136/jnis.2009.001339
PMID:21994288
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

As evidence accumulates that carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a durable and effective procedure for stroke prevention, the utility of the procedure hinges on the perioperative risk. The perioperative risk of CAS procedures has historically been higher than carotid endarterectomy in most clinical trials. The perioperative risk of the series presented here is lower than any previously reported in the context of a clinical trial.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively from 227 consecutive elective CAS procedures by a single neurointerventionalist performed as part of carotid stenting clinical trials as per the trial protocols, which included randomized trials of "average risk" patients and non-randomized trials of "high risk" patients. The primary outcome measures were 30 day stroke and death, and in most cases 30 day myocardial infarction (MI) also.

RESULTS

Follow-up was 100%. There were no deaths. There was one technical failure. The overall 30 day stroke/death/MI rate was 5/226 (2.2%). There was one MI. The 30 day stroke and death rate for symptomatic patients was 2.5% and for asymptomatic patients 1.4%. Two of the four strokes occurred in vascular territories separate from the target carotid artery.

CONCLUSIONS

The perioperative CAS complications in this series were well below the 6% for symptomatic patients and 3% for asymptomatic patients currently recommended based on historic carotid endarterectomy data. Carotid stenting can be performed safely in the community, provided there are experienced interventionalists and proper patient selection.

摘要

背景与目的

随着越来越多的证据表明颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)是预防中风的一种持久有效的方法,该手术的应用取决于围手术期风险。在大多数临床试验中,CAS 手术的围手术期风险一直高于颈动脉内膜切除术。本系列报道的围手术期风险低于任何以前在临床试验背景下报告的风险。

方法

由一名神经介入医生前瞻性地收集 227 例连续的择期 CAS 手术数据,这些手术是根据试验方案进行的颈动脉支架置入临床试验的一部分,其中包括“平均风险”患者的随机试验和“高风险”患者的非随机试验。主要结局指标为 30 天内卒中及死亡,在大多数情况下还包括 30 天内心肌梗死(MI)。

结果

随访率为 100%。无死亡病例。有 1 例技术失败。总的 30 天卒中/死亡/MI 发生率为 5/226(2.2%)。有 1 例 MI。有症状患者的 30 天卒中及死亡率为 2.5%,无症状患者为 1.4%。4 例卒中中有 2 例发生在与靶颈动脉不同的血管区域。

结论

本系列的围手术期 CAS 并发症明显低于目前基于颈动脉内膜切除术数据推荐的有症状患者 6%和无症状患者 3%的并发症发生率。只要有经验丰富的介入医生和适当的患者选择,颈动脉支架置入术可以在社区中安全进行。

相似文献

1
Thirty day results of 227 consecutive carotid stent procedures performed in carotid stenting clinical trials.227 例连续颈动脉支架置入术临床试验 30 天结果。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2009 Dec;1(2):154-8. doi: 10.1136/jnis.2009.001339. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
2
Safety and efficacy of carotid stenting in the very elderly.高龄患者颈动脉支架置入术的安全性和有效性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Apr 1;75(5):651-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22345.
3
Long-term results of 442 consecutive, standardized carotid endarterectomy procedures in standard-risk and high-risk patients.442例标准风险和高风险患者连续进行标准化颈动脉内膜切除术的长期结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Nov;46(5):876-882. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.06.045.
4
Safety of latest-generation self-expanding stents in patients with NASCET-ineligible severe symptomatic extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.新一代自膨式支架在不符合北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术(NASCET)标准的重度症状性颅外颈内动脉狭窄患者中的安全性
Arch Neurol. 2004 Jan;61(1):39-43. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.1.39.
5
Outcomes of carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis: a single neurovascular center retrospective review of 101 consecutive patients.颈动脉狭窄高危患者颈动脉支架置入术的结果:单神经血管中心 101 例连续患者的回顾性研究。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Mar;66(3):448-53; discussion 453-4. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000365008.17803.AD.
6
Carotid artery stenting according to the tailored-CAS algorithm is associated with a low complication rate at 30 days: data from the TARGET-CAS study.根据定制化颈动脉支架术(CAS)算法行颈动脉支架置入术与 30 天内低并发症发生率相关:TARGET-CAS 研究的数据。
Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(4):378-86.
7
Outcome of carotid artery stenting for primary versus restenotic lesions.原发性病变与再狭窄病变的颈动脉支架置入术结果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 May-Jun;23(3):330-4. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
8
Carotid endarterectomy--an evidence-based review [RETIRED]: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.颈动脉内膜切除术——基于证据的综述[已停用]:美国神经病学学会治疗与技术评估小组委员会报告
Neurology. 2005 Sep 27;65(6):794-801. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000176036.07558.82.
9
Thirty-day outcomes for carotid artery stenting in 6320 patients from 2 prospective, multicenter, high-surgical-risk registries.来自 2 个前瞻性、多中心、高手术风险登记处的 6320 例患者的颈动脉支架置入术 30 天结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jun;2(3):159-66. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.823013. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
10
The CAPTURE registry: predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting with embolic protection for high surgical risk patients in the early post-approval setting.CAPTURE注册研究:早期批准后使用栓子保护装置对高手术风险患者进行颈动脉支架置入术的预后预测因素。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Dec 1;70(7):1025-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21359.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.第二代与第一代颈动脉支架的临床结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 17;11(16):4819. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164819.
2
Asymptomatic carotid stenosis: Medicine alone or combined with carotid revascularization.无症状性颈动脉狭窄:单纯药物治疗还是联合颈动脉血运重建术。
Neurology. 2017 May 23;88(21):2061-2065. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003956. Epub 2017 Apr 26.