Oliván Palacios J, Alvarez Velasco F, Cubero Lorenzo M L
Sección de Neurofisiología Clínica, Centro Nacional de Investigación Clínica y Medicina Preventiva, Madrid.
Arch Neurobiol (Madr). 1990 Mar-Apr;53(2):84-8.
Pattern reversal evoked potentials were recorded from 40 people (20 males and 20 females) in good health. Latency and amplitude of P100 as well as cephalic perimeter and temperature were measured. Both samples did not differ in age. Males had a greater cephalic perimeter (p less than 0.00001) and females had a greater temperature (p less than 0.05). Amplitude of P100 decreased with age. We did not obtain any relation among cephalic perimeter or temperature with P100 latency or amplitude. We conclude that the consideration of these measurements does not increase the sensibility of VEP.
对40名健康人（20名男性和20名女性）记录了图形翻转诱发电位。测量了P100的潜伏期和波幅以及头围和体温。两个样本在年龄上没有差异。男性的头围更大（p<0.00001），女性的体温更高（p<0.05）。P100的波幅随年龄下降。我们未发现头围或体温与P100潜伏期或波幅之间存在任何关联。我们得出结论，考虑这些测量值并不会提高视觉诱发电位的敏感性。
