Suppr超能文献

比较疗效研究的方法。

The methods of comparative effectiveness research.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA.

出版信息

Annu Rev Public Health. 2012 Apr;33:425-45. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124610. Epub 2012 Jan 3.

Abstract

This review describes methods used in comparative effectiveness research (CER). The aim of CER is to improve decisions that affect medical care at the levels of both policy and the individual. The key elements of CER are (a) head-to-head comparisons of active treatments, (b) study populations typical of day-to-day clinical practice, and (c) a focus on evidence to inform care tailored to the characteristics of individual patients. These requirements will stress the principal methods of CER: observational research, randomized trials, and decision analysis. Observational studies are especially vulnerable because they use data that directly reflect the decisions made in usual practice. CER will challenge researchers and policy makers to think deeply about how to extract more actionable information from the vast enterprise of the daily practice of medicine. Fortunately, the methods are largely applicable to research in the public health system, which should therefore benefit from the intense interest in CER.

摘要

这篇综述描述了在比较效果研究(CER)中使用的方法。CER 的目的是改善影响政策和个人医疗护理的决策。CER 的关键要素是:(a)积极治疗的头对头比较,(b)日常临床实践中典型的研究人群,以及(c)专注于为个体患者特征量身定制护理的证据。这些要求将强调 CER 的主要方法:观察性研究、随机试验和决策分析。观察性研究尤其脆弱,因为它们使用直接反映日常实践中所做决策的数据。CER 将挑战研究人员和政策制定者,让他们深入思考如何从医学日常实践的庞大业务中提取更具操作性的信息。幸运的是,这些方法在很大程度上适用于公共卫生系统的研究,因此应该受益于对 CER 的浓厚兴趣。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验