Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, 250 Durham Hall (0118), Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Appl Ergon. 2012 Sep;43(5):843-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
Team manual material handling is a common practice in residential construction where prefabricated building components (e.g., wall panels) are increasingly used. As part of a larger effort to enable proactive control of ergonomic exposures among workers handling panels, this study explored the effects of additional workers on injury risks during team-based panel erection tasks, specifically by quantifying how injury risks are affected by increasing the number of workers (by one, above the nominal or most common number). Twenty-four participants completed panel erection tasks with and without an additional worker under different panel mass and size conditions. Four risk assessment methods were employed that emphasized the low back. Though including an additional worker generally reduced injury risk across several panel masses and sizes, the magnitude of these benefits varied depending on the specific task and exhibited somewhat high variability within a given task. These results suggest that a simple, generalizable recommendation regarding team-based panel erection tasks is not warranted. Rather, a more systems-level approach accounting for both injury risk and productivity (a strength of panelized wall systems) should be undertaken.
团队手动搬运在住宅建筑中很常见,在住宅建筑中越来越多地使用预制建筑组件(例如墙板)。作为主动控制工人处理面板时人体工程学暴露的更大努力的一部分,本研究探讨了在基于团队的面板安装任务中增加工人数量对伤害风险的影响,具体来说,通过量化增加工人数量(超过名义或最常见数量)如何影响伤害风险。二十四名参与者在不同的面板质量和尺寸条件下,在有和没有额外工人的情况下完成了面板安装任务。采用了四种强调下背部的风险评估方法。虽然增加一名额外工人通常会降低几种面板质量和尺寸下的伤害风险,但这些好处的幅度因具体任务而异,并且在给定任务内表现出一定的高度可变性。这些结果表明,对于基于团队的面板安装任务,不应该有一个简单的、可推广的建议。相反,应该采用一种更系统的方法来考虑伤害风险和生产力(这是壁板式墙体系统的优势)。