• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在儿科患者中,艰难梭菌毒素 A 和 B 的酶免疫测定法出现假阳性的比例较高。

High proportion of false-positive Clostridium difficile enzyme immunoassays for toxin A and B in pediatric patients.

机构信息

Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;33(2):175-9. doi: 10.1086/663706. Epub 2011 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1086/663706
PMID:22227987
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the frequency of false-positive Clostridium difficile toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA) results in hospitalized children and to examine potential reasons for this false positivity.

DESIGN

Nested case-control.

SETTING

Two tertiary care pediatric hospitals.

METHODS

As part of a natural history study, prospectively collected EIA-positive stools were cultured for toxigenic C. difficile, and characteristics of children with false-positive and true-positive EIA results were compared. EIA-positive/culture-negative samples were recultured after dilution and enrichment steps, were evaluated for presence of the tcdB gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and were further cultured for Clostridium sordellii, a cause of false-positive EIA toxin assays.

RESULTS

Of 112 EIA-positive stools cultured, 72 grew toxigenic C. difficile and 40 did not, indicating a positive predictive value of 64% in this population. The estimated prevalence of C. difficile infection (CDI) in the study sites among children tested for this pathogen was 5%-7%. Children with false-positive EIA results were significantly younger than those with true-positive tests but did not differ in other characteristics. No false-positive specimens yielded C. difficile when cultured after enrichment or serial dilution, 1 specimen was positive for tcdB by PCR, and none grew C. sordellii.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-third of EIA tests used to evaluate pediatric inpatients for CDI were falsely positive. This finding was likely due to the low prevalence of CDI in pediatric hospitals, which diminishes the test's positive predictive value. These data raise concerns about the use of EIA assays to diagnosis CDI in children.

摘要

目的

确定住院儿童中假阳性艰难梭菌毒素酶联免疫吸附试验(EIA)结果的频率,并探讨这种假阳性的潜在原因。

设计

巢式病例对照研究。

地点

两家三级儿童保健医院。

方法

作为自然史研究的一部分,前瞻性收集 EIA 阳性粪便进行产毒艰难梭菌培养,并比较 EIA 阳性和真阳性结果的儿童特征。EIA 阳性/培养阴性的样本经过稀释和富集步骤后进行再次培养,通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)评估 tcdB 基因的存在情况,并进一步培养产毒梭状芽孢杆菌,该菌可导致 EIA 毒素检测出现假阳性。

结果

在 112 份培养的 EIA 阳性粪便中,有 72 份培养出产毒艰难梭菌,40 份未培养出产毒艰难梭菌,表明该人群的阳性预测值为 64%。在该病原体检测的研究地点,儿童中艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的估计患病率为 5%-7%。EIA 结果为假阳性的儿童明显比真阳性测试的儿童年龄小,但其他特征无差异。经过富集或连续稀释培养后,没有假阳性标本产生艰难梭菌,1 份标本通过 PCR 检测 tcdB 呈阳性,也没有培养出产毒梭状芽孢杆菌。

结论

用于评估儿科住院患者 CDI 的 EIA 检测中,约有三分之一为假阳性。这一发现可能是由于儿科医院 CDI 的患病率较低,降低了该检测的阳性预测值。这些数据引起了人们对 EIA 检测用于诊断儿童 CDI 的担忧。

相似文献

1
High proportion of false-positive Clostridium difficile enzyme immunoassays for toxin A and B in pediatric patients.在儿科患者中,艰难梭菌毒素 A 和 B 的酶免疫测定法出现假阳性的比例较高。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;33(2):175-9. doi: 10.1086/663706. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
2
Two-step glutamate dehydrogenase antigen real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.两步谷氨酸脱氢酶抗原实时聚合酶链反应检测产毒艰难梭菌。
J Hosp Infect. 2010 Jan;74(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.08.014. Epub 2009 Nov 8.
3
[Investigation of toxin genes of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from hospitalized patients with diarrhoea at Marmara University Hospital].[对从马尔马拉大学医院腹泻住院患者中分离出的艰难梭菌菌株毒素基因的研究]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2011 Jan;45(1):1-10.
4
Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease: examination of multiple algorithms using toxin EIA, glutamate dehydrogenase EIA and loop-mediated isothermal amplification.艰难梭菌相关性疾病的诊断:使用毒素酶免疫测定、谷氨酸脱氢酶酶免疫测定和环介导等温扩增对多种算法进行检测
Br J Biomed Sci. 2012;69(3):112-8.
5
Comparison of VIDAS CDAB and CDA immunoassay for the detection of Clostridium difficile in a tcdA- tcdB+ C. difficile prevalent area.比较 VIDAS CDAB 和 CDA 免疫检测法在 tcdA- tcdB+ 艰难梭菌流行地区检测艰难梭菌的效果。
Anaerobe. 2009 Dec;15(6):266-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.09.008. Epub 2009 Sep 20.
6
Low sensitivity of fecal toxin A/B enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection in immunocompromised patients.粪便毒素 A/B 酶免疫分析法诊断免疫抑制患者艰难梭菌感染的灵敏度低。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015 Nov;21(11):998.e9-998.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.07.016. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
7
Clinical relevance of a positive molecular test in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.分子检测阳性对艰难梭菌感染诊断的临床意义。
J Hosp Infect. 2013 Aug;84(4):311-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
8
[Comparison of two enzyme immunoassay for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A and toxin B].两种酶免疫测定法检测艰难梭菌毒素A和毒素B的比较
Korean J Lab Med. 2009 Apr;29(2):122-6. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2009.29.2.122.
9
Prospective comparison of a commercial multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction and an enzyme immunoassay with toxigenic culture in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated infections.商业多重实时聚合酶链反应与酶免疫测定与产毒培养在艰难梭菌相关性感染诊断中的前瞻性比较。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Apr;75(4):361-5. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.12.010. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
10
Evaluation of different methods for detection of Clostridium difficile toxins in Poland.波兰不同艰难梭菌毒素检测方法的评估。
Acta Microbiol Pol. 1999;48(4):349-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Three Immunoassays for the Simultaneous Detection of Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxin A/B.三种免疫分析法同时检测谷氨酸脱氢酶和毒素A/B的比较评估
Microorganisms. 2022 Apr 30;10(5):947. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10050947.
2
Lack of false-positive results for Clostridioides difficile toxins A and B using two commercial enzyme immunoassays in pediatric patients.在儿科患者中使用两种商业酶免疫测定法检测艰难梭菌毒素A和B时未出现假阳性结果。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;40(7):825-826. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.104. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
3
Simultaneous Detection of Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxin A/B: Comparison of the C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE and RIDASCREEN Assays.
同时检测谷氨酸脱氢酶和毒素 A/B:C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE 和 RIDASCREEN 检测方法的比较。
Ann Lab Med. 2019 Mar;39(2):214-217. doi: 10.3343/alm.2019.39.2.214.
4
Recent Issues in Pediatric Clostridium difficile Infection.小儿艰难梭菌感染的近期问题
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2017 Nov 7;19(12):49. doi: 10.1007/s11908-017-0603-8.
5
False-Positive Clostridium difficile in Negative-Control Reactions Peak and Then Decrease with Repetitive Refrigeration of Immunoassay.免疫测定反复冷藏时,阴性对照反应中艰难梭菌假阳性先达到峰值然后下降。
Int Sch Res Notices. 2014 Sep 11;2014:128120. doi: 10.1155/2014/128120. eCollection 2014.
6
Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infections in Children.儿童艰难梭菌感染的诊断
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Jun;54(6):1425-1433. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03014-15. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
7
Characteristics and Antibiotic Use Associated With Short-Term Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection Among Hospitalized Patients.住院患者艰难梭菌感染短期风险相关的特征及抗生素使用情况
Am J Clin Pathol. 2015 Jun;143(6):895-900. doi: 10.1309/AJCP9EWI6QPVTPQY.
8
Clostridium difficile in Children: To Treat or Not to Treat?儿童艰难梭菌感染:治疗还是不治疗?
Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2014 Jun;17(2):80-4. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2014.17.2.80. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
9
Clostridium difficile infection diagnosis in a paediatric population: comparison of methodologies.儿童艰难梭菌感染的诊断方法比较。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Sep;33(9):1555-64. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2108-9. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
10
Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.艰难梭菌感染的诊断:临床医生和临床实验室面临的持续难题。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013 Jul;26(3):604-30. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00016-13.