Pediatric, Acute Care Pediatric & Neonatal Nurse Practitioner Program, The University of Texas at Arlington, College of Nursing, Arlington, Texas, USA.
Simul Healthc. 2012 Feb;7(1):10-7. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31823652de.
Virtual environments offer a variety of benefits and may be a powerful medium with which to provide nursing education. The objective of this study was to compare the achievement of learning outcomes of undergraduate nursing students when a virtual patient trainer or a traditional lecture was used to teach pediatric respiratory content.
This was a randomized, controlled, posttest design. A virtual pediatric hospital unit was populated with four virtual pediatric patients having different respiratory diseases that were designed to meet the same learning objectives as a traditional lecture. The study began in Spring 2010 with 93 Senior I, baccalaureate nursing students. Students were randomized to receive either a traditional lecture or an experience with a virtual patient trainer. Students' knowledge acquisition was evaluated using multiple-choice questions, and knowledge application was measured as timeliness of care in two simulated clinical scenarios using high-fidelity mannequins and standardized patients.
Ninety-three students participated in the study, of which 46 were in the experimental group that received content using the virtual patient trainer. After the intervention, students in the experimental group had significantly higher knowledge acquisition (P = 0.004) and better knowledge application (P = 0.001) for each of the two scenarios than students in the control group.
The purpose of this project was to compare a virtual patient trainer to a traditional lecture for the achievement of learning outcomes for pediatric respiratory content. Although the virtual patient trainer experience produced statistically better outcomes, the differences may not be clinically significant. The results suggest that a virtual patient trainer may be an effective substitute for the achievement of learning outcomes that are typically met using a traditional lecture format. Further research is needed to understand how best to integrate a virtual patient trainer into undergraduate nursing education.
虚拟环境提供了多种好处,并且可能是提供护理教育的强大媒介。本研究的目的是比较使用虚拟患者训练器或传统讲座教授本科护理学生儿科呼吸内容时学习成果的实现。
这是一项随机、对照、后测设计。一个虚拟儿科医院病房中充斥着四个患有不同呼吸系统疾病的虚拟儿科患者,这些患者旨在满足与传统讲座相同的学习目标。该研究于 2010 年春季开始,共有 93 名初级护理学生。学生被随机分配接受传统讲座或虚拟患者训练器的体验。使用多项选择题评估学生的知识获取,使用高保真人体模型和标准化患者在两个模拟临床场景中衡量知识应用的及时性,以衡量护理的及时性。
93 名学生参加了这项研究,其中 46 名学生在实验组中接受了使用虚拟患者训练器的内容。干预后,实验组学生在两个场景中的知识获取(P=0.004)和知识应用(P=0.001)均显著高于对照组学生。
本项目的目的是比较虚拟患者训练器与传统讲座在儿科呼吸内容学习成果方面的效果。尽管虚拟患者训练器体验产生了统计学上更好的结果,但差异可能没有临床意义。结果表明,虚拟患者训练器可能是实现通常通过传统讲座形式实现的学习成果的有效替代品。需要进一步研究,以了解如何将虚拟患者训练器最好地整合到本科护理教育中。