Suppr超能文献

十年调查揭示全科医生在处理颈背痛方面的差异。

Ten-year survey reveals differences in GP management of neck and back pain.

机构信息

Musculoskeletal Division, The George Institute for Global Health, The University of Sydney, PO Box M201, Missenden Rd, Camperdown, NSW 2000, Australia.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2012 Jul;21(7):1283-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2135-5. Epub 2012 Jan 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Clinical guidelines provide similar recommendations for the management of new neck pain and low back pain (LBP) but it is unclear if general practitioner's (GP) care is similar. While GP's management of LBP is well documented, little is known about GP's management of neck pain. We aimed to describe GP's management of new neck pain and compare this to GP's management of new LBP in Australia between April 2000 and March 2010.

METHODS

All GP-patient encounters for a new (i.e. first visit to any medical practitioner) neck pain or LBP problem were compared in terms of treatment delivered, referral patterns and requests for laboratory and imaging investigations.

RESULTS

General practitioners in Australia have managed new neck pain and LBP problems at a rate of 3.1 and 5.8 per 1,000 GP-patient encounters, respectively. GP's primarily utilised medications, in particular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, to manage new neck and LBP problems and referred approximately 25% of all patients for imaging. Patients with new neck pain are more frequently managed using physical treatments and were referred more often to allied health professionals and specialists. In comparison, patients with new LBP were managed more frequently with medication, advice, provision of a sickness certificate and ordering of pathology tests.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first time GP management of a new episode of neck pain has been documented using a nationally representative sample and it is also the first time that the management of back and neck pain has been compared. Despite guidelines endorsing a similar approach for the management of new neck pain and LBP, in actual clinical practice Australian GPs manage these two conditions differently.

摘要

目的

临床指南为新发颈痛和腰痛(LBP)的管理提供了类似的建议,但尚不清楚全科医生(GP)的治疗方法是否相似。虽然 GP 治疗 LBP 的情况已有详细记录,但对 GP 治疗颈痛的情况知之甚少。我们旨在描述 GP 对新发颈痛的管理,并比较 2000 年 4 月至 2010 年 3 月期间澳大利亚 GP 对新发 LBP 的管理。

方法

比较澳大利亚所有 GP 患者新发(即首次就诊于任何医疗从业者)颈痛或 LBP 问题的治疗方法、转诊模式以及对实验室和影像学检查的要求。

结果

澳大利亚 GP 管理新发颈痛和 LBP 问题的比例分别为每 1000 名 GP 患者 3.1 例和 5.8 例。GP 主要使用药物,特别是非甾体抗炎药,来治疗新发颈痛和 LBP 问题,并将约 25%的患者转诊进行影像学检查。新发颈痛患者更常接受物理治疗,并更常转诊至理疗师和专家。相比之下,新发 LBP 患者更常接受药物治疗、建议、开具病假条和进行病理检查。

结论

这是首次使用全国代表性样本记录 GP 对新发颈痛的管理,也是首次比较腰痛和颈痛的管理。尽管指南支持对新发颈痛和 LBP 采用类似的管理方法,但在实际临床实践中,澳大利亚 GP 对这两种情况的管理方法不同。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Clinician's Commentary on Belot et al..临床医生对贝洛特等人的评论。
Physiother Can. 2017;69(4):290-291. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2016-32-CC.

本文引用的文献

5
Neck pain.颈部疼痛。
BMJ Clin Evid. 2008 Aug 4;2008:1103.
7
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain.用于治疗腰痛的非甾体抗炎药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;2008(1):CD000396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000396.pub3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验