Liao Meng-Sheng, Huang Ming-Ju, Watts John D
Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Jackson State University, Jackson, Mississippi 39217.
Mol Phys. 2011 Aug 20;109(16):2035-2048. doi: 10.1080/00268976.2011.609141.
Sixty-four (64) density functionals, ranging from GGA, meta-GGA, hybrid GGA to hybrid meta-GGA, were tested to evaluate the FeP(Im)-AB bonding energies (E(bond)) in the heme model complexes FeP(Im)(AB) (P = porphine, Im = imidazole, AB = CO, NO, and O(2)). The results indicate that an accurate prediction of E(bond) for the various ligands to heme is difficult with the DFT methods; usually a functional successful for one system does not perform equally well for the other system(s). Relatively satisfactory results for the various FeP(Im)-AB bonding energies are obtained with the meta-GGA funtionals BLAP3 and Bmτ1; they yield E(bond) values of ca.1.1, 1.2, and 0.4 eV for AB = CO, NO, and O(2), respectively, which are in reasonable agreement with experimental data (0.78 - 0.85 eV for CO, 0.99 eV for NO, and 0.44 - 0.53 eV for O(2)). The other functionals show more or less deficiency for one or two of the systems. The performances of the various functionals in describing the spin-state energetics of the five-coordinate FeP(Im) complex were also examined.
测试了64种密度泛函,范围从广义梯度近似(GGA)、meta-GGA、杂化GGA到杂化meta-GGA,以评估血红素模型配合物FeP(Im)(AB)(P = 卟啉,Im = 咪唑,AB = CO、NO和O₂)中的FeP(Im)-AB键能(E(bond))。结果表明,用密度泛函理论(DFT)方法准确预测各种配体与血红素的E(bond)是困难的;通常对一个体系成功的泛函对其他体系的表现并不同样出色。使用meta-GGA泛函BLAP3和Bmτ1获得了各种FeP(Im)-AB键能相对令人满意的结果;对于AB = CO、NO和O₂,它们分别给出约1.1、1.2和0.4 eV的E(bond)值,这与实验数据(CO为0.78 - 0.85 eV,NO为0.99 eV,O₂为0.44 - 0.53 eV)合理吻合。其他泛函对一两个体系或多或少存在不足。还研究了各种泛函在描述五配位FeP(Im)配合物的自旋态能量方面的表现。