Suppr超能文献

一项比较头孢托罗匹酯美他醇与头孢曲松及联用或不联用利奈唑胺治疗需要住院治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者的随机、双盲临床试验。

A randomised, double-blind trial comparing ceftobiprole medocaril with ceftriaxone with or without linezolid for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalisation.

机构信息

Janssen Pharmaceuticals Scientific Affairs LLC., Titusville, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012 Mar;39(3):240-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.11.005. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

Abstract

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a serious infection requiring hospitalisation in 20% of cases. The novel cephalosporin ceftobiprole has microbiological activity against the major bacterial pathogens causing CAP, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Klebsiella pneumoniae, as well as against Staphylococcus aureus, including meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). This was a multicentre, double-blind study in which 706 patients with CAP severe enough to require hospitalisation were randomised to ceftobiprole or to an expert-recommended course of ceftriaxone ± linezolid (comparator group). Clinical and microbiological outcomes were determined 7-14 days after completion of therapy (test-of-cure visit). For the 469 clinically evaluable patients, cure rates were 86.6% vs. 87.4% for ceftobiprole and comparator, respectively [95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference, -6.9% to 5.3%]; in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis of 638 CAP patients, these cure rates were 76.4% vs. 79.3%, respectively (95% CI of the difference, -9.3% to 3.6%). A typical bacterial pathogen was identified in 29% of the ITT population. Microbiological eradication rates in the 144 microbiologically evaluable patients were 88.2% and 90.8% for the respective treatment groups (95% CI of the difference, -12.6% to 7.5%). Both study drugs were well tolerated, with but a minority of patients requiring premature discontinuation due to an adverse event (6% in the ceftobiprole group and 4% in the comparator group). The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events was higher in the ceftobiprole group, primarily owing to differences in rates of self-limited nausea (7% vs. 2%) and vomiting (5% vs. 2%). In summary, ceftobiprole was non-inferior to the comparator (ceftriaxone ± linezolid) in all clinical and microbiological analyses conducted, suggesting that ceftobiprole has a potential role in treating hospitalised patients with CAP. [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00326287].

摘要

社区获得性肺炎(CAP)是一种严重的感染,20%的病例需要住院治疗。新型头孢菌素头孢托罗具有针对引起 CAP 的主要细菌病原体的微生物学活性,包括肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌,以及金黄色葡萄球菌,包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)。这是一项多中心、双盲研究,共纳入 706 例病情严重需要住院治疗的 CAP 患者,随机分为头孢托罗组或专家推荐的头孢曲松+利奈唑胺疗程(对照组)。治疗结束后 7-14 天进行临床和微生物学疗效评估(治愈随访)。在 469 例可临床评估的患者中,头孢托罗组和对照组的治愈率分别为 86.6%和 87.4%[差异的 95%置信区间(CI)为-6.9%至 5.3%];在 638 例 CAP 患者的意向治疗(ITT)分析中,这两组的治愈率分别为 76.4%和 79.3%,差异的 95%CI 为-9.3%至 3.6%。在 ITT 人群中,29%的患者鉴定出了一种典型的细菌病原体。在 144 例可微生物学评估的患者中,两组的微生物学清除率分别为 88.2%和 90.8%(差异的 95%CI 为-12.6%至 7.5%)。两种研究药物均具有良好的耐受性,少数患者因不良事件(头孢托罗组 6%,对照组 4%)提前停药。头孢托罗组治疗相关不良事件的总体发生率较高,主要是由于自限性恶心(7%比 2%)和呕吐(5%比 2%)发生率的差异所致。总之,在所有进行的临床和微生物学分析中,头孢托罗均不劣于对照组(头孢曲松+利奈唑胺),这表明头孢托罗在治疗住院 CAP 患者方面具有潜在作用。[临床试验.gov 标识符:NCT00326287]

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验