Department of Political Science, University of Minnesota, USA.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2011 Dec;36(6):917-33. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1460515.
Research on stasis or change in public opinion toward health, health policy, and medical care tends to focus on short-term dynamics and to emphasize the impact of discrete messages communicated by individual speakers in particular situations. This focus on what we term "situational framing," though valuable in some respects, is poorly equipped to assess changes that may occur over the longer term. We focus, instead, on "structural framing" to understand how institutionalized public health and health care policies impact public opinion and behavior over time. Understanding the dynamics of public opinion over time is especially helpful in tracking the political effects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 as it moves from the debate over its passage to its implementation and operation.
公众对健康、卫生政策和医疗的态度的变化或稳定的研究往往集中在短期动态上,并强调特定情况下个别发言人传达的离散信息的影响。这种对我们所谓的“情境框架”的关注,虽然在某些方面很有价值,但却无法评估可能在较长时间内发生的变化。相反,我们关注“结构性框架”,以了解制度化的公共卫生和医疗保健政策如何随着时间的推移影响公众意见和行为。随着时间的推移了解公众意见的动态,对于跟踪 2010 年《患者保护与平价医疗法案》的政治影响特别有帮助,因为该法案从通过辩论到实施和运作都在不断发展。