• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对欧洲卫生政策的意见,从 COVID-19 大流行中吸取的教训。

Public Opinion on European Health Policy, Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic.

机构信息

The Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 15-17 Dorobanti Street, 010552 Bucharest, Romania.

National Scientific Research Institute for Labor and Social Protection, 6-8 Povernei Street, 010643 Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 15;19(8):4813. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084813.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19084813
PMID:35457679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9028759/
Abstract

Often, global crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, bring to light crucial weaknesses in political, economic, social and health systems. First, there are governments who formulate and implement policies and, second, there are the citizens who support them, thus contributing a great deal to their success. Our paper investigates the European citizens' opinion on health policy, focusing on their preference for European health policy during the coronavirus pandemic. The paper uses bibliometric analysis, descriptive statistics, and logistic regression to discuss the public opinion on health policy, the factors of influence, the change in perspectives between 2020 and 2021, and the socio-demographic profile of those favorable for the development of a European health policy in response to the coronavirus pandemic. Our findings show that citizens from southern and central European countries are more likely to prioritize the development of a European health policy, as compared to Nordic countries. Between 2020 and 2021, pro-European health policy citizens profile changes and becomes clearer, from pensioners to young working age males with medium education. In general, people prioritizing a European health policy value health as the most important issue at a national level are generally satisfied with the European Union and do not trust their national government.

摘要

通常,全球性危机,如 COVID-19 大流行,会凸显出政治、经济、社会和卫生系统的重大弱点。首先是制定和实施政策的政府,其次是支持政府的公民,他们为政策的成功做出了巨大贡献。我们的论文研究了欧洲公民对卫生政策的看法,重点关注他们在冠状病毒大流行期间对欧洲卫生政策的偏好。本文使用文献计量分析、描述性统计和逻辑回归来讨论公众对卫生政策的看法、影响因素、2020 年至 2021 年观点的变化,以及那些有利于制定欧洲卫生政策以应对冠状病毒大流行的社会人口特征。我们的研究结果表明,与北欧国家相比,来自南欧和中欧国家的公民更有可能优先制定欧洲卫生政策。在 2020 年至 2021 年期间,支持欧洲卫生政策的公民的形象发生了变化,并变得更加清晰,从养老金领取者转变为具有中等教育水平的年轻工作年龄男性。总的来说,优先考虑欧洲卫生政策的人认为健康是国家层面最重要的问题,他们普遍对欧盟感到满意,并不信任本国政府。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1931/9028759/e7a4f6d630f5/ijerph-19-04813-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1931/9028759/0c9ba1b3ad0f/ijerph-19-04813-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1931/9028759/1efdce39f3e2/ijerph-19-04813-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1931/9028759/d2d640797177/ijerph-19-04813-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1931/9028759/733d680f3f2a/ijerph-19-04813-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1931/9028759/e7a4f6d630f5/ijerph-19-04813-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1931/9028759/0c9ba1b3ad0f/ijerph-19-04813-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1931/9028759/1efdce39f3e2/ijerph-19-04813-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1931/9028759/d2d640797177/ijerph-19-04813-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1931/9028759/733d680f3f2a/ijerph-19-04813-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1931/9028759/e7a4f6d630f5/ijerph-19-04813-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Public Opinion on European Health Policy, Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic.公众对欧洲卫生政策的意见,从 COVID-19 大流行中吸取的教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 15;19(8):4813. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084813.
2
Effects of the COVID-19 Emergency and National Lockdown on Italian Citizens' Economic Concerns, Government Trust, and Health Engagement: Evidence From a Two-Wave Panel Study.COVID-19 紧急状态和全国封锁对意大利公民经济担忧、政府信任和健康参与的影响:来自两轮面板研究的证据。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):369-392. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12506. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
3
United but divided: Policy responses and people's perceptions in the EU during the COVID-19 outbreak.联合但分裂:新冠疫情期间欧盟的政策应对与民众认知。
Health Policy. 2020 Sep;124(9):909-918. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
4
Citizens' Adherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Recommendations by the Government: A 3-Country Comparative Evaluation Using Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Data.公民对政府新冠疫情缓解建议的遵守情况:基于网络横断面调查数据的三国比较评估
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e20634. doi: 10.2196/20634.
5
Assessing COVID-19 pandemic policies and behaviours and their economic and educational trade-offs across US states from Jan 1, 2020, to July 31, 2022: an observational analysis.评估 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 31 日美国各州的 COVID-19 大流行政策和行为及其经济和教育方面的权衡取舍:一项观察性分析。
Lancet. 2023 Apr 22;401(10385):1341-1360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00461-0. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
6
Perspective: Lessons from COVID-19 of countries in the European region in light of findings from the health system response monitor.观点:从卫生系统应对监测中获得的结果,来看欧洲区域各国在 COVID-19 方面的经验教训。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 6;10:1058729. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1058729. eCollection 2022.
7
What factors drive the satisfaction of citizens with governments' responses to COVID-19?哪些因素驱动公民对政府应对 COVID-19 措施的满意度?
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;102:327-331. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.050. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
8
Public Opinion and Expectations: Development of Public Health Education in China After COVID-19 Pandemic.公众意见和期望:新冠疫情后中国公共卫生教育的发展。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 10;9:702146. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.702146. eCollection 2021.
9
Dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe: five lessons from the European Society for Traumatic Stress Studies.应对欧洲的 COVID-19 大流行:欧洲创伤后应激研究学会的五个经验教训。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 May 3;13(1):2046330. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2046330. eCollection 2022.
10
Pandemic preparedness and COVID-19: an exploratory analysis of infection and fatality rates, and contextual factors associated with preparedness in 177 countries, from Jan 1, 2020, to Sept 30, 2021.大流行防范与新冠疫情:对2020年1月1日至2021年9月30日期间177个国家的感染率、死亡率以及与防范相关的背景因素进行的探索性分析。
Lancet. 2022 Apr 16;399(10334):1489-1512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00172-6. Epub 2022 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Public Perceptions on the Efficiency of National Healthcare Systems Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情前后公众对国家医疗系统效率的看法
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 28;13(17):2146. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13172146.

本文引用的文献

1
The short-term economic consequences of COVID-19: Occupation tasks and mental health in Canada.新冠疫情的短期经济后果:加拿大的职业任务与心理健康
Can J Econ. 2022 Feb;55(Suppl 1):214-247. doi: 10.1111/caje.12543. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
2
Exogenous shocks and citizens' satisfaction with governmental policies: can empirical evidence from the 2008 financial crisis help us understand better the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic?外部冲击与公民对政府政策的满意度:2008年金融危机的实证证据能否帮助我们更好地理解新冠疫情的影响?
Qual Quant. 2021;55(6):1973-2000. doi: 10.1007/s11135-020-01087-2. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
3
Searching for General Model of Conspiracy Theories and Its Implication for Public Health Policy: Analysis of the Impacts of Political, Psychological, Structural Factors on Conspiracy Beliefs about the COVID-19 Pandemic.
探寻阴谋论的通用模型及其对公共卫生政策的启示:政治、心理、结构因素对新冠大流行阴谋论信念影响的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 31;18(1):266. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010266.
4
Engaging nurses in health policy in the era of COVID-19.在 COVID-19 时代让护士参与卫生政策。
Nurs Forum. 2021 Jan;56(1):89-94. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12514. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
A qualitative enquiry into strategic and operational responses to Covid-19 challenges in South Asia.对南亚应对新冠疫情挑战的战略和行动响应的定性调查。
J Public Aff. 2020 Nov;20(4):e2195. doi: 10.1002/pa.2195. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
6
Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: A bibliometric analysis approach.探究商业与管理领域中新兴的新冠病毒研究趋势:一种文献计量分析方法。
J Bus Res. 2020 Sep;118:253-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.057. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
7
The Successes and Failures of the Initial COVID-19 Pandemic Response in Romania.罗马尼亚应对 COVID-19 大流行初期的成败。
Front Public Health. 2020 Jul 10;8:344. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00344. eCollection 2020.
8
COVID-19 - An Opportunity to Redesign Health Policy Thinking.COVID-19——重新设计卫生政策思维的契机。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Apr 1;11(4):409-413. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.132.
9
Role of modelling in COVID-19 policy development.建模在 COVID-19 政策制定中的作用。
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2020 Sep;35:57-60. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
10
Modelling insights into the COVID-19 pandemic.对 COVID-19 大流行的建模洞察。
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2020 Sep;35:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2020.06.014. Epub 2020 Jun 20.