Laboratory of Apiculture and Social Insects, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QG, United Kingdom.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 24;109(4):1182-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113398109. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
Division of labor among workers is common in insect societies and is thought to be important in their ecological success. In most species, division of labor is based on age (temporal castes), but workers in some ants and termites show morphological specialization for particular tasks (physical castes). Large-headed soldier ants and termites are well-known examples of this specialization. However, until now there has been no equivalent example of physical worker subcastes in social bees or wasps. Here we provide evidence for a physical soldier subcaste in a bee. In the neotropical stingless bee Tetragonisca angustula, nest defense is performed by two groups of guards, one hovering near the nest entrance and the other standing on the wax entrance tube. We show that both types of guards are 30% heavier than foragers and of different shape; foragers have relatively larger heads, whereas guards have larger legs. Low variation within each subcaste results in negligible size overlap between guards and foragers, further indicating that they are distinct physical castes. In addition, workers that remove garbage from the nest are of intermediate size, suggesting that they might represent another unrecognized caste. Guards or soldiers are reared in low but sufficient numbers (1-2% of emerging workers), considering that <1% usually perform this task. When challenged by the obligate robber bee Lestrimelitta limao, an important natural enemy, larger workers were able to fight for longer before being defeated by the much larger robber. This discovery opens up opportunities for the comparative study of physical castes in social insects, including the question of why soldiers appear to be so much rarer in bees than in ants or termites.
工蜂分工在昆虫社会中很常见,被认为对其生态成功至关重要。在大多数物种中,分工是基于年龄(时间分工),但在一些蚂蚁和白蚁中,工蜂表现出特定任务的形态特化(物理分工)。大头兵蚁和白蚁就是这种特化的典型例子。然而,直到现在,在社会性蜜蜂或胡蜂中还没有发现物理工蜂亚等级的等同例子。在这里,我们提供了一种蜜蜂中存在物理兵蜂亚等级的证据。在新热带无刺蜜蜂 Tetragonisca angustula 中,巢防御由两组守卫者执行,一组在巢门口盘旋,另一组站在蜡质入口管上。我们表明,这两种类型的守卫者比采集者重 30%,并且形状不同;采集者的头部相对较大,而守卫者的腿部较大。每个亚等级内的变异很小,导致守卫者和采集者之间的体型重叠可忽略不计,进一步表明它们是不同的物理等级。此外,从巢中清除垃圾的工蜂体型中等,表明它们可能代表另一种未被识别的等级。考虑到通常只有 <1%的工蜂执行这项任务,因此,守卫者或兵蜂的数量较少但足以维持(占新出现工蜂的 1-2%)。当面临专性掠夺蜂 Lestrimelitta limao 的挑战时,体型较大的工蜂能够在被体型大得多的掠夺蜂击败之前,更长时间地战斗。这一发现为比较研究社会性昆虫中的物理分工开辟了机会,包括为什么在蜜蜂中,兵蜂似乎比蚂蚁或白蚁更为罕见的问题。