Department of Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan 48504-6214, USA.
Pain Med. 2012 Jan;13(1):115-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01292.x.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of noninvasive cortical electrostimulation in the management of fibromyalgia (FM). DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design was used. Setting. Subjects received therapy at two different outpatient clinical locations. PATIENTS: There were 77 subjects meeting the American College of Rheumatology 1990 classification criteria for FM. Intervention. Thirty-nine (39) active treatment (AT) FM patients and 38 placebo controls received 22 applications of either noninvasive cortical electrostimulation or a sham therapy over an 11-week period. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were the number of tender points (TePs) and pressure pain threshold (PPT). Secondary outcome measures were responses to the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90), Beck Depression Inventory-II, and a novel sleep questionnaire, all evaluated at baseline and at the end of treatment. RESULTS: Intervention provided significant improvements in TeP measures: compared with placebo, the AT patients improved in the number of positive TePs (-7.4 vs -0.2, P<0.001) and the PPT (19.6 vs -3.2, P<0.001). Most secondary outcomes also improved more in the AT group: total FIQ score (-15.5 vs -5.6, P=0.03), FIQ pain (-2.0 vs -0.6, P=0.03), FIQ fatigue (-2.0 vs -0.4, P=0.02), and FIQ refreshing sleep (-2.1 vs -0.7, P=0.02); and while FIQ function improved (-1.0 vs -0.2), the between-group change had a 14% likelihood of occurring due to chance (P=0.14). There were no significant side effects observed. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive cortical electrostimulation in FM patients provided modest improvements in pain, TeP measures, fatigue, and sleep; and the treatment was well tolerated. This form of therapy could potentially provide worthwhile adjunctive symptom relief for FM patients.
目的:本多中心研究旨在评估无创皮层电刺激治疗纤维肌痛(FM)的疗效、安全性和耐受性。
设计:采用前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照设计。地点:受试者在两个不同的门诊临床地点接受治疗。
患者:共有 77 名符合美国风湿病学院 1990 年纤维肌痛分类标准的患者。干预:39 名(39 名)主动治疗(AT)FM 患者和 38 名安慰剂对照患者在 11 周内接受 22 次无创皮层电刺激或假治疗。
主要观察指标:主要观察指标为压痛点数(TePs)和压痛阈值(PPT)。次要观察指标为纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQ)、症状清单-90(SCL-90)、贝克抑郁量表-II 和一项新的睡眠问卷的反应,所有指标均在基线和治疗结束时进行评估。
结果:干预措施在 TeP 测量方面有显著改善:与安慰剂相比,AT 患者的阳性 TeP 数(-7.4 对-0.2,P<0.001)和 PPT(19.6 对-3.2,P<0.001)均有所改善。大多数次要结局在 AT 组中也有更大的改善:总 FIQ 评分(-15.5 对-5.6,P=0.03)、FIQ 疼痛(-2.0 对-0.6,P=0.03)、FIQ 疲劳(-2.0 对-0.4,P=0.02)和 FIQ 清爽睡眠(-2.1 对-0.7,P=0.02);虽然 FIQ 功能有所改善(-1.0 对-0.2),但两组之间的变化有 14%的可能性是由于偶然发生的(P=0.14)。未观察到明显的副作用。
结论:无创皮层电刺激治疗纤维肌痛患者在疼痛、TeP 测量、疲劳和睡眠方面提供了适度的改善,且治疗耐受性良好。这种治疗方法可能为纤维肌痛患者提供有价值的辅助症状缓解。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012-4-21
Biomedicines. 2025-4-17
Front Neurosci. 2023-10-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-4-13
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-3-16
Arthritis Res Ther. 2013