Kwok Dorothy W S, Livesey Evan J, Boakes Robert A
University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Learn Behav. 2012 Dec;40(4):427-38. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0064-0.
Three experiments tested whether events taking place before a rat has access to a target taste, sucrose, can proactively interfere with the acquisition of a sucrose aversion when sucrose is followed by a lithium chloride injection. Using a serial overshadowing procedure with various delays before lithium injection, proactive interference by a taste (Experiments 1 and 3) and by a novel context (Experiment 2) was found following two conditioning sessions, but not after a single conditioning session. Conversely, overshadowing by a taste given after the target was detectable after a single conditioning trial (Experiment 3) and, thus, indicated that retroactive interference involves a process different from that producing proactive interference. A simulation confirmed that the results are consistent with a modified Rescorla and Wagner (1972) interpretation of Revusky's (1971) concurrent interference theory of delay learning.
三项实验测试了在大鼠接触目标味道蔗糖之前发生的事件,在蔗糖之后注射氯化锂时,是否会主动干扰蔗糖厌恶反应的习得。采用在注射锂之前设置不同延迟的系列遮蔽程序,在经过两次条件训练后,发现一种味道(实验1和3)和一个新环境(实验2)会产生主动干扰,但在单次条件训练后则不会。相反,在单次条件试验后(实验3)就能检测到目标味道之后呈现的味道产生的遮蔽效应,因此表明, retroactive interference涉及的过程与产生主动干扰的过程不同。一项模拟证实,这些结果与对Revusky(1971)延迟学习并发干扰理论的修正版Rescorla和Wagner(1972)解释一致。 (注:原文中“retroactive interference”未翻译,因为不确定是否是特定专业术语,若有准确释义可进一步完善)