• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

追踪小组成员:波间接触策略的实验测试

Keeping Track of Panel Members: An Experimental Test of a Between-Wave Contact Strategy.

作者信息

McGonagle Katherine, Couper Mick, Schoeni Robert F

机构信息

Institute for Social Research, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, PO Box 1248, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, U.S.A.

出版信息

J Off Stat. 2011;27(2):319-338.

PMID:22235162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3253355/
Abstract

The Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) is a nationally representative longitudinal survey of approximately 9,000 families and their descendants that has been ongoing since 1968. Since 1969, families have been sent a mailing asking them to update or verify their contact information to keep track of their whereabouts between waves. Having updated contact information prior to data collection is associated with fewer call attempts and refusal conversion efforts, less tracking, and lower attrition. Given these apparent advantages, a study was designed in advance of the 2009 PSID field effort to improve the response rate of the contact update mailing. Families were randomly assigned to the following conditions: mailing design (traditional versus new), $10 as a prepaid versus postpaid incentive, timing and frequency of the mailing (July 2008 versus October 2008 versus both times) and whether or not they were sent a study newsletter. This paper reports on findings with regards to response rates to the mailing and the effect on production outcomes including tracking rates and number of calls during 2009 by these different conditions, examines whether the treatment effects differ by key characteristics of panel members including likelihood of moving and anticipated difficulty in completing an interview, and provides some recommendations for the use of contact update strategies in panel studies.

摘要

收入动态跟踪调查(PSID)是一项具有全国代表性的纵向调查,自1968年以来一直在对约9000个家庭及其后代进行跟踪。自1969年起,会向这些家庭发送邮件,要求他们更新或核实联系方式,以便在各轮调查期间掌握其行踪。在数据收集之前更新联系方式,与减少电话拨打次数、降低拒绝回访转化率、减少跟踪以及降低样本流失率相关。鉴于这些明显的优势,在2009年PSID实地调查之前设计了一项研究,以提高联系方式更新邮件的回复率。家庭被随机分配到以下几种情况:邮件设计(传统邮件与新邮件)、10美元的预付费与后付费激励措施、邮件发送时间和频率(2008年7月与2008年10月与两次都发送)以及是否向他们发送研究通讯。本文报告了关于邮件回复率以及这些不同情况对2009年期间包括跟踪率和拨打次数在内的调查结果的影响,研究了处理效果是否因小组成员的关键特征(包括搬家可能性和预计完成访谈的难度)而有所不同,并为在小组研究中使用联系方式更新策略提供了一些建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f2c/3253355/c319eaf0b2b7/nihms343942f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f2c/3253355/c319eaf0b2b7/nihms343942f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f2c/3253355/c319eaf0b2b7/nihms343942f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Keeping Track of Panel Members: An Experimental Test of a Between-Wave Contact Strategy.追踪小组成员:波间接触策略的实验测试
J Off Stat. 2011;27(2):319-338.
2
The Effects of a Between-Wave Incentive Experiment on Contact Update and Production Outcomes in a Panel Study.面板研究中波间激励实验对联系人更新和生产结果的影响
J Off Stat. 2013;29(2):261-276. doi: 10.2478/jos-2013-0022.
3
Risks and rewards of using prepaid vs. postpaid incentive checks on a survey of physicians.使用预付与后付激励支票对医生进行调查的风险与回报。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0565-z.
4
5
Incentive delivery timing and follow-up survey completion in a prospective cohort study of injured children: a randomized experiment comparing prepaid and postpaid incentives.在一项前瞻性队列研究中,激励发放时间和随访调查完成情况:预付和后付激励的随机对照试验比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01421-8.
6
An Experimental Evaluation of an Online Interview Scheduler: Effects on Fieldwork Outcomes.在线访谈调度器的实验评估:对实地调查结果的影响。
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2020 Oct 23;9(3):412-428. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smaa031. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
THE EFFECTS OF A TARGETED "EARLY BIRD" INCENTIVE STRATEGY ON RESPONSE RATES, FIELDWORK EFFORT, AND COSTS IN A NATIONAL PANEL STUDY.一项针对全国性面板研究中回应率、实地调查工作量及成本的“早起鸟”激励策略的效果
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2023 Nov;11(5):1032-1053. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smab042. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
9
The Effects of an Incentive Boost on Response Rates, Fieldwork Effort, and Costs across Two Waves of a Panel Study.激励提升对面板研究两波调查中的回应率、实地调查工作量及成本的影响
Methoden Daten Anal. 2020;14(2):241-250. doi: 10.12758/mda.2020.04.
10
Transitioning to a Mixed-Mode Study Design in a National Household Panel Study: Effects on Fieldwork Outcomes, Sample Composition and Costs.在一项全国性家庭面板研究中转向混合模式研究设计:对实地调查结果、样本构成和成本的影响。
Surv Res Methods. 2023 Dec 22;17(4):411-427.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of an Incentive Boost on Response Rates, Fieldwork Effort, and Costs across Two Waves of a Panel Study.激励提升对面板研究两波调查中的回应率、实地调查工作量及成本的影响
Methoden Daten Anal. 2020;14(2):241-250. doi: 10.12758/mda.2020.04.
2
Engagement and attrition in Internet smoking cessation interventions: Insights from a cross-sectional survey of "one-hit-wonders".互联网戒烟干预中的参与度与退出率:对“昙花一现者”横断面调查的见解
Internet Interv. 2016 Jul 7;5:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2016.07.001. eCollection 2016 Sep.
3
An Incentive Experiment Designed to Increase Response to a Between-Wave Contact Update Mailing in Two Panel Studies.一项旨在提高两个面板研究中对波间联系更新邮件回复率的激励实验。
Surv Pract. 2011;4(3).
4
The Effects of a Between-Wave Incentive Experiment on Contact Update and Production Outcomes in a Panel Study.面板研究中波间激励实验对联系人更新和生产结果的影响
J Off Stat. 2013;29(2):261-276. doi: 10.2478/jos-2013-0022.
5
The Panel Study of Income Dynamics: Overview, Recent Innovations, and Potential for Life Course Research.收入动态跟踪调查:概述、近期创新及生命历程研究潜力
Longit Life Course Stud. 2012;3(2). doi: 10.14301/llcs.v3i2.188.
6
Response Rates in National Panel Surveys.全国性小组调查中的回应率。
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2013 Jan;645(1):60-87. doi: 10.1177/0002716212456363.