Watson Christopher M, Barnett Daniel J, Thompson Carol B, Hsu Edbert B, Catlett Christina L, Gwon Howard S, Semon Natalie L, Balicer Ran D, Links Jonathan M
Department of Pediatrics, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Am J Disaster Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;6(5):299-308. doi: 10.5055/ajdm.2011.0069.
The aim of this study was to characterize the public health emergency perceptions and willingness to respond (WTR) of hospital-based pediatric staff and to use these findings to propose a methodology for developing an institution-specific training package to improve response willingness.
A prospective anonymous web-based survey was conducted at the Johns Hopkins Hospital, including the 180-bed Johns Hopkins Children's Center, between January and March 2009. In this survey, participants' attitudes/beliefs regarding emergency response to a pandemic influenza and a radiological dispersal device (RDD or "dirty bomb") event were assessed.
Of the 1,620 eligible pediatric staff 246 replies (15.2 percent response rate) were received, compared with an overall staff response rate of 18.4 percent. Characteristics of respondent demographics and professions were similar to those of overall hospital staff. Self-reported WTR was greater for a pandemic influenza than for an RDD event if required (84.6 percent vs 75.1 percent), and if asked, but not required (74.4 percent vs 64.5 percent). The majority of pediatric staff were not confident in their safety at work (pandemic influenza: 51.8 percent and RDD: 76.6 percent), were far less likely to respond if personal protective equipment was unavailable (pandemic influenza: 33.5 percent and RDD: 21.6percent), and wanted furtherpre-event preparation and training (pandemic influenza: 89.6 percent and RDD: 82.6 percent). The following six distinct perceived attitudes / beliefs were identified as having institution-specific high impact on response willingness: colleague response, skill mastery, safety getting to work, safety at work, ability to perform duties, and individual response efficacy.
Children represent a uniquely vulnerable population in public health emergencies, and pediatric hospital staff accordingly represent a vital subset of responders distinguished by specialized education, training, clinical skills, and disaster competencies. Even though the majority of pediatric hospital staff report WTR, nearly 15 percent for a pandemic influenza emergency and 25 percent for an RDD event would not respond if required. Other institutions can apply the methodology used here to identify particularly influential response willingness modifiers for pediatric care providers. These insights can inform customized preparedness training for pediatric healthcare workers, through identification of high-impact attitudes/beliefs, and training initiatives focused on addressing these modifiers.
本研究旨在描述医院儿科工作人员对突发公共卫生事件的认知以及应对意愿(WTR),并利用这些研究结果提出一种方法,以制定针对特定机构的培训方案,提高应对意愿。
2009年1月至3月期间,在约翰霍普金斯医院(包括拥有180张床位的约翰霍普金斯儿童中心)进行了一项基于网络的前瞻性匿名调查。在这项调查中,评估了参与者对大流行性流感和放射性散布装置(RDD或“脏弹”)事件应急响应的态度/信念。
在1620名符合条件的儿科工作人员中,收到了246份回复(回复率为15.2%),而医院全体工作人员的总体回复率为18.4%。受访者的人口统计学特征和职业与医院全体工作人员相似。如果有要求,自我报告的对大流行性流感的应对意愿高于对RDD事件的应对意愿(84.6%对75.1%);如果只是询问但没有要求,也是如此(74.4%对64.5%)。大多数儿科工作人员对其工作安全缺乏信心(大流行性流感:51.8%,RDD:76.6%),如果没有个人防护设备,他们做出响应的可能性要小得多(大流行性流感:33.5%,RDD:21.6%),并且希望在事件发生前进行更多准备和培训(大流行性流感:89.6%,RDD:82.6%)。以下六种不同的感知态度/信念被确定为对机构特定的应对意愿有高度影响:同事的响应、技能掌握、上班途中的安全、工作中的安全、履行职责的能力以及个人响应效能。
在突发公共卫生事件中,儿童是特别易受伤害的人群,因此儿科医院工作人员是应急响应人员中至关重要的一部分,他们具有专业的教育、培训、临床技能和灾害应对能力。尽管大多数儿科医院工作人员报告有应对意愿,但如果有要求,近15%的人不会对大流行性流感紧急情况做出响应,25%的人不会对RDD事件做出响应。其他机构可以应用此处使用的方法,为儿科护理人员确定特别有影响力的应对意愿调节因素。通过识别高影响力的态度/信念以及专注于解决这些调节因素的培训举措,这些见解可为儿科医护人员的定制化应急准备培训提供参考。