• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死、心搏骤停复苏后和心原性休克患者的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:多血管血运重建的作用。

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock: the role of primary multivessel revascularization.

机构信息

Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Institut Hospitalier Jacques Cartier, Massy, and Hôpital Claude Galien, Quincy, France.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;6(2):115-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.006. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.006
PMID:23352816
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the impact of multivessel (MV) primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS) and resuscitated cardiac arrest (CA).

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of MV primary PCI in patients with STEMI and refractory CS is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study of consecutive STEMI patients presenting to 5 French centers. Patients were classified as having single-vessel (SVD) or multivessel (MVD) coronary disease, and underwent culprit-only or MV primary PCI. Baseline characteristics and 6-month survival were compared.

RESULTS

Among 11,530 STEMI patients, 266 had resuscitated CA and CS. Patients with SVD (36.5%) had increased 6-month survival compared to those with MVD (29.6% vs. 42.3%, p = 0.032). Baseline characteristics were similar in those with MVD undergoing culprit-only (60.9%) or MV (39.1%) primary PCI. However, 6-month survival was significantly greater in patients who underwent MV PCI (43.9% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.0017). This survival advantage was mediated by a reduction in the composite of recurrent CA and death due to shock (p = 0.024) in MV PCI patients. In those with MVD, culprit artery PCI success (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41 to 0.96, p = 0.030) and MV primary PCI (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.84, p = 0.005) were associated with increased 6-month survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that in STEMI patients with MVD presenting with CS and CA, MV primary PCI may improve clinical outcome. Randomized trials are required to verify these results.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估多支血管(MV)直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)对伴心源性休克(CS)和复苏性心脏骤停(CA)的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者临床结局的影响。

背景

MV 直接 PCI 治疗 STEMI 合并难治性 CS 的安全性和有效性尚不清楚。

方法

我们进行了一项多中心前瞻性观察性研究,纳入了 5 家法国中心连续收治的 STEMI 患者。患者分为单支血管(SVD)或多支血管(MVD)病变,并接受罪犯血管或 MV 直接 PCI。比较基线特征和 6 个月生存率。

结果

在 11530 例 STEMI 患者中,有 266 例发生复苏性 CA 和 CS。SVD 患者(36.5%)的 6 个月生存率高于 MVD 患者(29.6% vs. 42.3%,p = 0.032)。MVD 患者中,仅罪犯血管(60.9%)或 MV(39.1%)直接 PCI 的基线特征相似。然而,MV PCI 患者的 6 个月生存率显著更高(43.9% vs. 20.4%,p = 0.0017)。MV PCI 患者的主要复合终点(再发 CA 和因休克导致的死亡)发生率降低,这是导致生存率差异的原因(p = 0.024)。在 MVD 患者中,罪犯动脉 PCI 成功(风险比[HR]:0.63;95%置信区间[CI]:0.41 至 0.96,p = 0.030)和 MV 直接 PCI(HR:0.57;95%CI:0.38 至 0.84,p = 0.005)与 6 个月生存率增加相关。

结论

本研究结果表明,在伴 CS 和 CA 的 MVD STEMI 患者中,MV 直接 PCI 可能改善临床结局。需要随机试验来验证这些结果。

相似文献

1
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock: the role of primary multivessel revascularization.急性心肌梗死、心搏骤停复苏后和心原性休克患者的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:多血管血运重建的作用。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;6(2):115-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.006. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
2
Culprit or multivessel revascularisation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心源性休克时的罪犯血管或多支血管血运重建
Heart. 2015 Aug;101(15):1225-32. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-307220. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
3
Long-term outcome in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease treated with culprit-only, immediate, or staged multivessel percutaneous revascularization strategies: Insights from the REAL registry.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者采用仅处理罪犯血管、即刻或分期多支血管经皮血管重建策略的长期预后:来自REAL注册研究的见解
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov 15;84(6):912-22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25374. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
4
Use and outcomes of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (from the EHS-PCI Registry).急性心肌梗死后并发心源性休克患者的多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的应用及结局(来自 EHS-PCI 注册研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Apr 1;109(7):941-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.11.020. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
5
Single or multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的单支或多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec 1;72(7):927-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21722.
6
The HEART study: a real-world experience using the CID Chrono Carbostent in primary and rescue PCI.HEART 研究:在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和补救性 PCI 中使用 CID Chrono Carbostent 的真实世界经验。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2012 Dec;13(12):775-82. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32834102d8.
7
Outcome of emergency percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiac arrest.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心脏骤停的急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果
Coron Artery Dis. 2008 Dec;19(8):615-8. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32831381b4.
8
Culprit Vessel-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis.罪犯血管血运重建与多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并发心原性休克的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者:一项协作荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov;10(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005582.
9
Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经桡动脉与股动脉入路行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的随机对照试验的荟萃分析
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):814-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.010.
10
Acute multivessel revascularization improves 1-year outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a nationwide study cohort from the AMIS Plus registry.急性多血管血运重建可改善 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者 1 年预后:来自 AMIS Plus 注册研究的全国性研究队列。
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Mar 1;172(1):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.083. Epub 2014 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between the Aggregate Index of Systemic Inflammation and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Study.急性心肌梗死患者全身炎症综合指数与临床结局的关联:一项回顾性研究。
J Inflamm Res. 2024 Oct 3;17:7057-7067. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S481515. eCollection 2024.
2
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Related to Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Literature Review.急性冠状动脉综合征相关院外心脏骤停的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:文献综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 24;12(23):7275. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237275.
3
Prognostic Impact of Different Types of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias Stratified by Underlying Cardiac Disease.
根据潜在心脏疾病分层的不同类型室性快速心律失常的预后影响
J Pers Med. 2022 Dec 7;12(12):2023. doi: 10.3390/jpm12122023.
4
Protocolized Post-Cardiac Arrest Care with Targeted Temperature Management.心脏骤停后采用目标温度管理的标准化护理方案
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2022 May;38(3):391-399. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202205_38(3).20211220A.
5
Multivessel vs. Culprit Vessel-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.多支血管与仅罪犯血管行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗心源性休克合并ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的疗效比较:一项更新的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 15;9:735636. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.735636. eCollection 2022.
6
Multivessel versus Culprit-Only Revascularization Strategies in Cardiac Arrest Survivors.心脏骤停幸存者的多支血管与仅罪犯血管血运重建策略
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2022 Mar;38(2):175-186. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202203_38(2).20211107A.
7
Could Selective Re-look Angiography Improve the Outcome of Cardiogenic Shock in Patients Under Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenator?选择性再造影术能否改善体外膜肺氧合支持下心源性休克患者的预后?
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2022 Apr;15(2):268-278. doi: 10.1007/s12265-022-10205-4. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
8
Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Interventional Approach to Management in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories.急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克的介入治疗在导管室的管理
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2022;18(2):e251121198293. doi: 10.2174/1573403X17666211125090929.
9
Does multivessel revascularization fit all patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis.多支血管血运重建适用于所有ST段抬高型心肌梗死和多支冠状动脉疾病患者吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021 Jun 11;35:100813. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100813. eCollection 2021 Aug.
10
Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in High-Risk Settings.高危情况下ST段抬高型心肌梗死的管理
Int J Angiol. 2021 Mar;30(1):53-66. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723941. Epub 2021 Feb 12.