Suppr超能文献

头颈部前哨淋巴结阳性黑色素瘤患者的完成节点解剖。

Completion node dissection in patients with sentinel node-positive melanoma of the head and neck.

机构信息

College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425-5500, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Apr;146(4):591-9. doi: 10.1177/0194599811432672. Epub 2012 Jan 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Determine if completion lymph node dissection (CLND) is associated with improved survival in sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck (CMHN) patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of large population database.

SETTING

Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database/multiple settings.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Using the SEER database, the authors identified patients with SLN-positive CMHN. Clinicopathologic data and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) were examined for patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone vs SLNB + CLND.

RESULTS

Among 350 SLN-positive patients, 210 (60%) had SLNB + CLND, and 140 (40%) had SLNB only. Patients in the SLNB-only group were significantly older (median age 62 vs 53 years, P < .0001). The cohort as a whole did not significantly benefit from CLND; however, CLND was associated with improved DSS for a subgroup of patients age <60 years with nonulcerated tumors ≤ 2 mm thick (P = .03). Relative to SLNB alone, CLND did not improve survival for patients age ≥ 60 years or those with thicker (>2 mm) or ulcerated tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with SLNB alone, CLND does not seem to be associated with improved survival for most patients with SLN-positive CMHN. CLND likely improves survival for patients age <60 years with thin (≤ 2 mm) nonulcerated tumors and when there is a low risk of identifying positive non-SLNs.

摘要

目的

确定完全淋巴结清扫(CLND)是否与头颈部皮肤黑色素瘤(CMHN)患者前哨淋巴结(SLN)阳性时的生存改善相关。

研究设计

回顾性大人群数据库分析。

设置

监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库/多个地点。

受试者和方法

作者使用 SEER 数据库,确定 SLN 阳性 CMHN 患者。对接受单独 SLNB 与 SLNB+CLND 的患者进行临床病理数据和 5 年疾病特异性生存(DSS)检查。

结果

在 350 例 SLN 阳性患者中,210 例(60%)行 SLNB+CLND,140 例(40%)行 SLNB 单独治疗。SLNB 单独治疗组的患者年龄明显更大(中位年龄 62 岁比 53 岁,P<0.0001)。整体队列并未因 CLND 而显著获益;然而,对于年龄<60 岁、肿瘤非溃疡且厚度≤2mm 的亚组患者,CLND 与 DSS 改善相关(P=0.03)。与 SLNB 单独治疗相比,CLND 并未改善年龄≥60 岁或肿瘤厚度>2mm 或溃疡患者的生存。

结论

与 SLNB 单独治疗相比,CLND 似乎并未改善大多数 SLN 阳性 CMHN 患者的生存。CLND 可能会改善年龄<60 岁、肿瘤非溃疡且厚度≤2mm 且存在非 SLN 阳性低风险的患者的生存。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验