• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[从超人类主义计划角度看人性与人类增强]

[Human nature and the enhancement of human beings in the light of the transhumanist program].

作者信息

Goffi Jean-Yves

机构信息

UPMF-Grenoble 2.

出版信息

J Int Bioethique. 2011 Sep-Dec;22(3-4):19-32, 191.

PMID:22238905
Abstract

There are three main approaches about the question of Human Nature. essentialists consider that there exists a permanent Human Nature, shared by every human being. Existentialists consider that there is no such thing as human nature, but inescapable modes of being in the world. A moderate approach would consider that Human Nature can be modified within the limits of anthropological invariants. Transhumanists are conservative in that they think that there is a Human Nature; but they are radical in that they believe that it can (and must) be transcended by bio-technnologies and computer technologies. This project is evaluated as a caricature of suitable human enhancement.

摘要

关于人性问题,主要有三种观点。本质主义者认为存在一种永恒不变的人性,为每个人所共有。存在主义者认为不存在人性这种东西,而只有不可避免的在世方式。一种温和的观点会认为,人性可以在人类学不变因素的范围内得到改变。超人类主义者较为保守,因为他们认为存在人性;但他们又很激进,因为他们相信人性能够(而且必须)被生物技术和计算机技术超越。这个项目被评价为对适当的人类增强的一种滑稽模仿。

相似文献

1
[Human nature and the enhancement of human beings in the light of the transhumanist program].[从超人类主义计划角度看人性与人类增强]
J Int Bioethique. 2011 Sep-Dec;22(3-4):19-32, 191.
2
Human nature and enhancement.人性与增强
Bioethics. 2009 Mar;23(3):141-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00633.x.
3
[Human technical enhancement: an introduction to the currents of the debate as well as their fracture lines].
J Int Bioethique. 2011 Sep-Dec;22(3-4):33-50, 192. doi: 10.3917/jib.222.0033.
4
Dignity, arête, and hubris in the transhumanist debate.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jul;10(7):67-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161003728845.
5
What is morally salient about enhancement technologies?增强技术在道德上有什么突出之处?
J Med Ethics. 2011 Feb;37(2):84-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.038257. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
6
Antiquity's Missive to Transhumanism1.古代致超人类主义的书信1。
J Med Philos. 2017 Jun 1;42(3):278-303. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhx008.
7
[Enhancement between self-realization and self-deception].
Ethik Med. 2006 Mar;18(1):10-26. doi: 10.1007/s00481-006-0410-5.
8
A Thomistic appraisal of human enhancement technologies.对人类增强技术的托马斯主义评估。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2014 Aug;35(4):289-310. doi: 10.1007/s11017-014-9300-x.
9
Man or machine?
New Atlantis. 2004 Winter;4:31-7.
10
Defending human enhancement technologies: unveiling normativity.捍卫人类增强技术:揭示规范性。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Aug;36(8):483-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.036095.