• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Enhancement between self-realization and self-deception].

作者信息

Gesang Bernward

机构信息

Philosophisches Institut, Universitat, Universitatsstrabe 1, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Ethik Med. 2006 Mar;18(1):10-26. doi: 10.1007/s00481-006-0410-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00481-006-0410-5
PMID:17153247
Abstract

Is it morally responsible to enhance human beings technically? To answer this question three problems will be analyzed: 1) Do we destroy human nature if we allow enhancement? 2) Can enhancement lead to a loss of autonomy and personality? 3) What are the differences between enhancement of adults and enhancement of children? Arguments and conclusion: I will defend a certain kind of moderate liberalism in order to solve these problems. I will focus on the question whether reversible enhancements must be evaluated differently from irreversible enhancements. Arguments from J. Habermas against enhancement of children will be rejected. Under certain conditions enhancement is not morally unacceptable but it must be ensured that these conditions are fulfilled.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Enhancement between self-realization and self-deception].
Ethik Med. 2006 Mar;18(1):10-26. doi: 10.1007/s00481-006-0410-5.
2
What is morally salient about enhancement technologies?增强技术在道德上有什么突出之处？
J Med Ethics. 2011 Feb;37(2):84-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.038257. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
3
[Ethical aspects of pharmacological cognition enhancement and the use of psychostimulants by children and young persons].[儿童和青少年药物认知增强及使用精神兴奋剂的伦理问题]
Ethik Med. 2006 Mar;18(1):27-36. doi: 10.1007/s00481-006-0411-4.
4
A Thomistic appraisal of human enhancement technologies.对人类增强技术的托马斯主义评估。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2014 Aug;35(4):289-310. doi: 10.1007/s11017-014-9300-x.
5
Human freedom and enhancement.人类自由与提升。
Med Health Care Philos. 2014 Feb;17(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9479-z.
6
[Human nature and the enhancement of human beings in the light of the transhumanist program].[从超人类主义计划角度看人性与人类增强]
J Int Bioethique. 2011 Sep-Dec;22(3-4):19-32, 191.
7
Human nature and enhancement.人性与增强
Bioethics. 2009 Mar;23(3):141-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00633.x.
8
Will biomedical enhancements undermine solidarity, responsibility, equality and autonomy?生物医学增强会破坏团结、责任、平等和自主吗？
Bioethics. 2011 May;25(4):177-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01779.x.
9
Is there a problem with enhancement?增强功能有问题吗？
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Summer;5(3):5-14. doi: 10.1080/15265160590945101.
10
Defending human enhancement technologies: unveiling normativity.捍卫人类增强技术：揭示规范性。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Aug;36(8):483-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.036095.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancement technologies and human identity.增强技术与人类身份。
J Med Philos. 2005 Jun;30(3):261-83. doi: 10.1080/03605310590960166.