• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

床边教学的患者选择:教师使用的纳入和排除标准。

Patient selection for bedside teaching: inclusion and exclusion criteria used by teachers.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2012 Feb;46(2):228-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04054.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04054.x
PMID:22239336
Abstract

CONTEXT

Bedside teaching encounters on hospital wards offer medical students opportunities to learn key medical and interpersonal skills. Although many aspects of bedside teaching have been studied, not much is known about the selection process used by medical teachers to find patients for these encounters. Patient selection could have a substantial impact on medical students' clinical experiences. Therefore, we studied the ways in which medical teachers select patients for bedside teaching and tried to determine the factors that affect patient selection.

METHODS

Using a qualitative research approach, we interviewed 15 teachers from three departments within the Medical Faculty at Hamburg University on how they choose patients for bedside teaching encounters. We extracted selection criteria from the transcripts of the audio-recorded interviews and identified other factors that influenced selection.

RESULTS

One main category and two minor categories of factors relevant to patient selection were identified: educational; bio-psycho-social, and structural. Medical teachers look primarily for patients who have diseases that fit their conceptions of the learning objectives of the lessons in question. The two minor categories influence their choice of patients in different ways. By finding a balance between these categories, they decide which patients are eligible for participation. As a result of these selection criteria, some patients are more likely to become involved in clinical teaching, whereas others may be omitted.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient selection for bedside teaching is based on several criteria. Non-representative patient selection may narrow the learning experiences of medical students. Curriculum planners need to be aware that specific aspects of medical care may be neglected as a result of the exclusion of some patients. Teacher training and additional teaching formats should be provided to ensure that these are covered.

摘要

背景

病房中的床边教学为医学生提供了学习关键医学和人际技能的机会。尽管床边教学的许多方面都已经过研究,但对于医学教师用来为这些教学机会选择患者的选择过程却知之甚少。患者选择可能会对医学生的临床经验产生重大影响。因此,我们研究了医学教师选择患者进行床边教学的方式,并试图确定影响患者选择的因素。

方法

采用定性研究方法,我们采访了汉堡大学医学系三个系的 15 位教师,了解他们如何选择患者进行床边教学。我们从录音采访的文字记录中提取了选择标准,并确定了影响选择的其他因素。

结果

确定了与患者选择相关的一个主要类别和两个次要类别:教育;生物心理社会和结构。医学教师主要寻找符合他们对所讨论课程学习目标的疾病的患者。两个次要类别以不同的方式影响他们对患者的选择。通过在这些类别之间找到平衡,他们决定哪些患者有资格参与。由于这些选择标准,一些患者更有可能参与临床教学,而其他患者可能会被排除在外。

结论

床边教学的患者选择基于多个标准。非代表性的患者选择可能会缩小医学生的学习经验。课程规划者需要意识到,由于某些患者被排除在外,可能会忽视特定的医疗护理方面。需要提供教师培训和其他教学形式,以确保涵盖这些方面。

相似文献

1
Patient selection for bedside teaching: inclusion and exclusion criteria used by teachers.床边教学的患者选择:教师使用的纳入和排除标准。
Med Educ. 2012 Feb;46(2):228-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04054.x.
2
Improving bedside teaching: findings from a focus group study of learners.改善床边教学:对学习者进行焦点小组研究的结果
Acad Med. 2008 Mar;83(3):257-64. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181637f3e.
3
Faculty and medical students' perceptions of teaching and learning about the doctor-patient relationship.教师和医学生对医患关系教学和学习的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 May;79(2):199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.08.012. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
4
Has bedside teaching had its day?床边教学是否已经过时?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012 May;17(2):301-4. doi: 10.1007/s10459-011-9308-1. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
5
Medical education by bedside learning - helping medical students to interact with patients who have head and neck cancer.床边学习式医学教育——帮助医学生与头颈癌患者互动。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2007 Apr;127(4):408-10. doi: 10.1080/00016480601011485.
6
The construction of power in family medicine bedside teaching: a video observation study.家庭医学床边教学中的权力构建:一项视频观察研究。
Med Educ. 2013 Feb;47(2):154-65. doi: 10.1111/medu.12055.
7
Effective teaching and learning on the wards: easier said than done?病房内有效的教学与学习:说起来容易做起来难?
Med Educ. 2009 Aug;43(8):808-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03427.x.
8
Cultural diversity teaching and issues of uncertainty: the findings of a qualitative study.文化多样性教学与不确定性问题:一项定性研究的结果
BMC Med Educ. 2007 Apr 26;7:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-8.
9
[The physician-patient course in the medical education in Trondheim].[特隆赫姆医学教育中的医患诊疗过程]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1994 Nov 10;114(27):3202-6.
10
The rural physician associate program: the value of immersion learning for third-year medical students.农村医师助理项目:沉浸式学习对三年级医学生的价值。
J Rural Health. 2008 Fall;24(4):353-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2008.00181.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Teaching: An Evidence-based Guide to Best Practices from the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors.临床教学:急诊医学住院医师主任委员会最佳实践的循证指南。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 3;21(4):985-998. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.4.46060.
2
Overcoming the barriers of teaching physical examination at the bedside: more than just curriculum design.克服床边体检教学的障碍:不仅仅是课程设计。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Dec 11;18(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1403-z.
3
Effects of Module Development and Role Play Course on Clinical Practice Examination Scores during a 4th Year Clerkship.
模块开发与角色扮演课程对四年级临床实习期间临床实践考试成绩的影响。
Korean J Fam Med. 2018 Jan;39(1):23-28. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.2018.39.1.23. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
4
Influence of motivation, self-efficacy and situational factors on the teaching quality of clinical educators.动机、自我效能感和情境因素对临床教育工作者教学质量的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 May 8;17(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0923-2.
5
Psychometric properties of the newly developed Physician Teaching Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PTSQ).新开发的医师教学自我效能量表(PTSQ)的心理测量学特性。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Sep 22;16(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0764-4.
6
Innovative integrative bedside teaching model improves tutors' self-assessments of teaching skills and attitudes.创新的综合床边教学模式提高了教师对教学技能和态度的自我评估。
Med Educ Online. 2016 Feb 16;21:30526. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.30526. eCollection 2016.
7
Validation of the Physician Teaching Motivation Questionnaire (PTMQ).医师教学动机问卷(PTMQ)的验证
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Oct 2;15:166. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0448-5.
8
Bedside Teaching: general and discipline-specific teacher characteristics, criteria for patient selection and difficulties.床边教学:一般及特定学科教师的特点、患者选择标准及困难
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2013 May 15;30(2):Doc23. doi: 10.3205/zma000866. Print 2013.
9
The art of bedside rounds: a multi-center qualitative study of strategies used by experienced bedside teachers.床边查房的艺术:一项多中心定性研究,探讨经验丰富的床边教师所使用的策略。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Mar;28(3):412-20. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2259-2. Epub 2012 Nov 6.