Mathematica Policy Research, 600 Maryland Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20024, USA.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2012 Jan;82(1):87-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2011.01128.x.
Policymakers, advocates, and families remain concerned about the use of seclusion and restraint in residential treatment facilities for children and youth. This study used data from 2 national surveys to examine the extent to which residential treatment facilities consistently implement certain practices following incidents of seclusion or restraint. The study found that 76% of facilities reported having secluded or restrained youth in the previous year; 34% of these facilities reported that, following such incidents, they always debrief the youth, family, and staff; notify the attending physician; and record the incident in the treatment plan. Accredited facilities and those that conduct a trauma assessment upon admission were more than twice as likely as others to consistently implement these practices. States and providers should continue to monitor seclusion and restraint practices and identify opportunities for quality improvement.
政策制定者、倡导者和家庭仍然关注在儿童和青少年住宿治疗设施中使用隔离和约束。这项研究使用了来自两项全国性调查的数据,以评估在发生隔离或约束事件后,住宿治疗设施在多大程度上一贯地实施某些做法。研究发现,76%的设施报告在过去一年中隔离或约束过青少年;其中 34%的设施报告说,在发生此类事件后,他们总是向青少年、家庭和工作人员进行汇报;通知主治医生;并在治疗计划中记录事件。经过认证的设施和那些在入院时进行创伤评估的设施,比其他设施更有可能一贯地实施这些做法。各州和提供者应继续监测隔离和约束做法,并确定改进质量的机会。