Hemodynamic classifications of acute heart failure and their clinical application: – an update –.

Acute heart failure (AHF) is classically defined by signs and symptoms related to elevated ventricular filling pressures. Regardless of precipitant, underlying etiology or ejection fraction, the vast majority of hospital admissions are the result of worsening chronic HF. For the acutely decompensated patient, 4 hemodynamic profiles, stratified by degree of congestion ("dry" or "wet") and adequacy of perfusion ("warm" or "cold") predict prognosis and guide therapy. Relief of congestion is the primary goal of AHF management. Loop diuretics remain the mainstay of AHF treatment, but new modalities such as veno-venous ultrafiltration are promising. For patients with evidence of hypoperfusion, vasoactive agents may be needed to facilitate diuresis. The decision to use vasodilators or inotropes is complex and the need for invasive hemodynamic monitoring is often determined by the individual patient's characteristics. Routine use of inotropes should be discouraged; however when used, the short-term hemodynamic benefits conferred by these agents must be balanced against their tendency to increase adverse events. Although these strategies are effective in alleviating symptoms in most patients, management dilemmas arise from cardiorenal interactions and limitations in effective novel therapies. Epidemiological studies continue to emphasize that AHF portends a poor prognosis. Further studies are needed to improve our understanding and outcomes in this growing patient population.