• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别与单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术后发病率和死亡率的关系。倾向评分匹配分析。

Association of gender with morbidity and mortality after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. A propensity score matched analysis.

机构信息

Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center 1030 Jefferson Avenue, Memphis, TN 38104, USA.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 15;167(1):180-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.12.047. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.12.047
PMID:22240765
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is conflicting evidence about the impact of gender on outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

We performed a multivariate logistic regression and propensity score matched analyses in 13,115 patients (75% men) who underwent CABG between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2009. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included post-operative respiratory failure, stroke, myocardial infarction, sternal and leg wound infections, atrial fibrillation (AF), renal failure, need for postoperative intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

A higher proportion of women (184; 5.6%) suffered in-hospital death compared to men (264; 2.7%), p<0.0001. After propensity score matching (n=3600 total, 1800 in each group), female gender was an independent predictor of mortality after isolated CABG (odds ratio [OR]=1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-2.78). Women also experienced a higher incidence of postoperative complications including stroke (3.8% vs. 2.3%, OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.08-1.73) and leg wound infection (3.4% vs. 1.7%, OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.36-2.54) on multivariate regression analyses. However, these differences were not significant after propensity score matching. We also observed a lower risk of post-operative AF (21.2% vs. 22.1%, OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.70-0.86) in women that remained significant after propensity matching (O.R. 0.76; 95% C.I. 0.65-0.90). Length of hospital stay was longer in women compared with men (11.9 ± 9.0 vs. 10.4 ± 9.2 days, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Female gender is an independent predictor of increased mortality and a lower incidence of post-operative AF after isolated CABG.

摘要

引言

关于性别对冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后结局的影响,目前存在相互矛盾的证据。

方法

我们对 1995 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 12 月 31 日期间接受 CABG 的 13115 例患者(75%为男性)进行了多变量逻辑回归和倾向评分匹配分析。主要结局是住院期间死亡率。次要结局包括术后呼吸衰竭、中风、心肌梗死、胸骨和腿部伤口感染、心房颤动(AF)、肾功能衰竭、术后需要主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)支持以及住院时间。

结果

与男性(264 例,2.7%)相比,更多的女性(184 例,5.6%)发生院内死亡,p<0.0001。在进行倾向评分匹配后(共 3600 例,每组 1800 例),女性性别是单纯 CABG 后死亡率的独立预测因素(优势比[OR]=1.84;95%置信区间[CI]1.22-2.78)。女性还经历了更高的术后并发症发生率,包括中风(3.8%比 2.3%,OR 1.37;95%CI 1.08-1.73)和腿部伤口感染(3.4%比 1.7%,OR 1.75;95%CI 1.36-2.54),这在多变量回归分析中也得到了证实。然而,在倾向评分匹配后,这些差异并不显著。我们还观察到女性术后心房颤动(AF)的风险较低(21.2%比 22.1%,OR 0.78;95%CI 0.70-0.86),在倾向匹配后仍然显著(OR 0.76;95%CI 0.65-0.90)。与男性相比,女性的住院时间更长(11.9±9.0 比 10.4±9.2 天,p<0.0001)。

结论

女性性别是单纯 CABG 后死亡率增加和术后 AF 发生率降低的独立预测因素。

相似文献

1
Association of gender with morbidity and mortality after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. A propensity score matched analysis.性别与单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术后发病率和死亡率的关系。倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 15;167(1):180-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.12.047. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
2
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting attenuates morbidity and mortality for patients with low and high body mass index.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术降低了低和高身体质量指数患者的发病率和死亡率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Dec;146(6):1442-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.035. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
3
Preoperative β-blocker use in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: national database analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植术中术前β受体阻滞剂的使用:国家数据库分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1320-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2356.
4
Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel disease.多支血管病变患者进行冠状动脉搭桥手术时体外循环使用与不使用的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Jan;127(1):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.08.032.
5
On-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left main stem disease: a propensity score analysis.在左主干病变患者中进行体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术:倾向评分分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Jun;143(6):1382-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.07.035. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
6
Off-pump coronary bypass provides reduced mortality and morbidity and equivalent 10-year survival.非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术可降低死亡率和发病率,并具有相当的10年生存率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;86(4):1139-46; discussion 1146. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.05.073.
7
Propensity case-matched analysis of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with atheromatous aortic disease.动脉粥样硬化性主动脉疾病患者非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的倾向病例匹配分析
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Feb;127(2):406-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.08.011.
8
Increased risk associated with combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a propensity-matched comparison with isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery.颈动脉内膜切除术与冠状动脉搭桥术联合手术相关的风险增加:与单纯冠状动脉搭桥术的倾向评分匹配比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2006 Dec;20(6):796-802. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2006.01.022. Epub 2006 May 4.
9
Resource utilization in off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting in a community hospital: a comparative analysis using propensity scoring.社区医院非体外循环与传统冠状动脉搭桥术的资源利用:一项使用倾向评分的比较分析
Heart Surg Forum. 2011 Apr;14(2):E81-6. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.201011115.
10
Previous percutaneous coronary interventions increase mortality and morbidity after coronary surgery.先前的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗增加了冠状动脉手术后的死亡率和发病率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Jun;93(6):1956-62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.02.067. Epub 2012 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender related outcome differences in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中与性别相关的结果差异。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Aug 1;12:1641784. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1641784. eCollection 2025.
2
Association between glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio and long-term mortality among women after coronary artery bypass grafting: filling gaps in female.冠状动脉搭桥术后女性患者血糖与淋巴细胞比值和长期死亡率之间的关联:填补女性研究空白
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Apr 29;25(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04563-5.
3
BMI disparities in coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes: A single center Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database analysis.
冠状动脉搭桥手术结果中的体重指数差异:一项单中心胸外科医师协会(STS)数据库分析。
Surg Pract Sci. 2022 Jul 14;10:100110. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100110. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Female patients exhibit altered vasopressin-induced coronary microvascular contractile response and molecular signaling following cardiac surgery.女性患者在心脏手术后表现出血管加压素诱导的冠状动脉微血管收缩反应和分子信号传导改变。
Am J Surg. 2025 Jan;239:116052. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116052. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
5
Sex differences in outcomes of patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.接受体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者结局的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0306902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306902. eCollection 2024.
6
Sex, Atrial Fibrillation, and Long-Term Mortality After Cardiac Surgery.性别、心房颤动与心脏手术后的长期死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2426865. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26865.
7
Patient-physician sex concordance and outcomes in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review.患者-医生性别一致性与心血管疾病结局的关系:系统评价。
Eur Heart J. 2024 May 7;45(17):1505-1511. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae121.
8
Sex differences in the management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome-Still an issue of equal treatment?急性冠状动脉综合征的管理和结局中的性别差异 - 仍然是公平待遇的问题吗?
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2023 Dec;135(23-24):663-666. doi: 10.1007/s00508-023-02302-4. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
9
Sex differences in coronary artery bypass graft surgery outcomes: a narrative review.冠状动脉搭桥手术结果中的性别差异:一项叙述性综述。
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Sep 28;15(9):5041-5054. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-294. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
10
Gender-Related Discrepancies in Short-Term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery.非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术患者短期预后的性别差异
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 12;12(6):2202. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062202.