Edwards J R, Baglioni A J, Cooper C L
Colgate Darden Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Virginia, Charlottesville 22906-6550.
Br J Psychol. 1990 Aug;81 ( Pt 3):315-33. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02364.x.
Recent evidence indicates that the relationship between Type A behaviour pattern (TABP) and coronary heart disease (CHD) is dependent upon the method of measuring TABP. This suggests that the psychometric properties of TABP measures should be carefully investigated. This article examines one widely used TABP measure, the Bortner Scale, using data from 1320 working adults divided into three random samples. The reliability of the Bortner Scale as an overall TABP index is unacceptably low. However, further analyses indicate that, rather than reflecting a single dimension, the Bortner Scale contains two independent dimensions, one reflecting speed and the other reflecting competitiveness. The speed dimension was negatively related to job satisfaction and, to a lesser extent, positively related to anxiety and somatic symptoms, whereas the competitiveness dimension was positively related to job satisfaction. Implications for the use of the Bortner Scale are discussed.
最近的证据表明,A型行为模式(TABP)与冠心病(CHD)之间的关系取决于测量TABP的方法。这表明应该仔细研究TABP测量方法的心理测量特性。本文使用来自1320名在职成年人的三个随机样本的数据,对一种广泛使用的TABP测量方法——博特纳量表进行了研究。博特纳量表作为整体TABP指标的可靠性低得令人无法接受。然而,进一步的分析表明,博特纳量表并非反映单一维度,而是包含两个独立维度,一个反映速度,另一个反映竞争力。速度维度与工作满意度呈负相关,在较小程度上与焦虑和躯体症状呈正相关,而竞争力维度与工作满意度呈正相关。文中讨论了使用博特纳量表的意义。