Edwards J R, Baglioni A J, Cooper C L
Colgate Darden Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Virginia, Charlottesville 22906-6550.
J Appl Psychol. 1990 Aug;75(4):440-54. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.75.4.440.
The most widely used self-report measures of the Type A behavior pattern (TABP) are the Bortner scale, the Framingham scale, and the Jenkins Activity Survey (JAS). Though high scores on each of these measures have been linked to the development of coronary heart disease, their intercorrelations are rather low, suggesting that they may reflect different aspects of TABP. This study indicates that the low correlations among the Bortner scale, the Framingham scale, and the JAS are due not only to differences in underlying constructs but also to measurement error and multidimensionality. These results also identify several psychometric problems, which raise serious questions regarding the use of these measures in TABP research. Suggestions for the development of new measures of TABP are offered.
最广泛使用的A型行为模式(TABP)自我报告测量方法是博特纳量表、弗雷明汉量表和詹金斯活动调查(JAS)。尽管这些测量方法中的每一种得分较高都与冠心病的发生有关,但其相互间的相关性相当低,这表明它们可能反映了TABP的不同方面。本研究表明,博特纳量表、弗雷明汉量表和JAS之间的低相关性不仅是由于潜在结构的差异,还由于测量误差和多维度性。这些结果还识别出了几个心理测量学问题,这对在TABP研究中使用这些测量方法提出了严重质疑。文中还提供了关于开发新的TABP测量方法的建议。