Suppr超能文献

审视A型行为模式自我报告测量方法之间的关系:维度、测量误差及潜在结构差异的影响。

Examining the relationships among self-report measures of the Type A behavior pattern: the effects of dimensionality, measurement error, and differences in underlying constructs.

作者信息

Edwards J R, Baglioni A J, Cooper C L

机构信息

Colgate Darden Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Virginia, Charlottesville 22906-6550.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 1990 Aug;75(4):440-54. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.75.4.440.

Abstract

The most widely used self-report measures of the Type A behavior pattern (TABP) are the Bortner scale, the Framingham scale, and the Jenkins Activity Survey (JAS). Though high scores on each of these measures have been linked to the development of coronary heart disease, their intercorrelations are rather low, suggesting that they may reflect different aspects of TABP. This study indicates that the low correlations among the Bortner scale, the Framingham scale, and the JAS are due not only to differences in underlying constructs but also to measurement error and multidimensionality. These results also identify several psychometric problems, which raise serious questions regarding the use of these measures in TABP research. Suggestions for the development of new measures of TABP are offered.

摘要

最广泛使用的A型行为模式(TABP)自我报告测量方法是博特纳量表、弗雷明汉量表和詹金斯活动调查(JAS)。尽管这些测量方法中的每一种得分较高都与冠心病的发生有关,但其相互间的相关性相当低,这表明它们可能反映了TABP的不同方面。本研究表明,博特纳量表、弗雷明汉量表和JAS之间的低相关性不仅是由于潜在结构的差异,还由于测量误差和多维度性。这些结果还识别出了几个心理测量学问题,这对在TABP研究中使用这些测量方法提出了严重质疑。文中还提供了关于开发新的TABP测量方法的建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验