University Hospital Munich Großhadern, Department of Neurology, Munich, Germany.
Hum Mov Sci. 2012 Oct;31(5):1071-89. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2011.12.002. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
Reaching movements are often used to study the effectiveness of motor control processes with respect to the final position of arm and hand. Empirical evidence shows that different targets can be grasped with similar final position accuracy. However, movements that achieve similar accuracy at their final position may nevertheless be controlled differently. In particular, control strategies may differ in the control of the abundant degrees of freedom with respect to the task-specific costs. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether the applied control strategy was influenced by the shape of the target to be grasped. It was investigated whether mechanical constraints, imposed on final hand orientation or final hand position by the shape of the targets, affected the synergistic coordination of the kinematic degrees of freedom of the arm. Subjects were asked to grasp either a cylindrical or a spherical target, which imposed different constraints on final hand orientation and position. Besides temporal movement aspects, variability of the joint angles of the arm, as well as variability of hand orientation and hand position was analyzed over the whole time course of movement execution, using the uncontrolled manifold method. Overall movement duration differed between cylindrical and spherical target condition, due to differences in deceleration duration. Reaching movements towards the cylindrical target, which was more constraint in final hand orientation and position, took longer than movements towards the spherical target. Analysis further revealed that the degrees of freedom of the arm were synergistically coordinated to stabilize both hand orientation and hand position, when grasping either the spherical or the cylindrical target. This suggests that the applied control strategy in natural reaching movements can simultaneously account for multiple task constraints. The analysis further revealed that stabilization of hand orientation was stronger when reaching towards a cylindrical target, which imposed more constraints on final hand orientation. In contrast, hand position was more strongly stabilized in the spherical target shape condition, where stronger constraints on final hand position were applied. This suggests that different target shapes do influence the control strategy of reaching movements even though variability at movement end was not affected.
伸手运动常被用于研究手臂和手部最终位置对运动控制过程的有效性。经验证据表明,不同的目标可以用相似的最终位置精度来抓取。然而,达到相似最终位置精度的运动可能仍有不同的控制方式。特别是,控制策略可能在特定任务成本方面对大量自由度的控制上有所不同。本研究的目的是调查所应用的控制策略是否受要抓取的目标形状的影响。研究了由目标形状施加在最终手部方向或最终手部位置上的机械约束是否会影响手臂运动自由度的协同协调。要求受试者抓取圆柱形或球形目标,这两种目标分别对最终手部方向和位置有不同的约束。除了时间运动方面,还使用无控制流形方法分析了整个运动执行过程中手臂关节角度的变异性,以及手部方向和手部位置的变异性。由于减速持续时间的不同,圆柱形和球形目标条件下的整体运动持续时间不同。朝向更受最终手部方向和位置约束的圆柱形目标的伸手运动比朝向球形目标的运动持续时间更长。分析进一步表明,当抓取球形或圆柱形目标时,手臂的自由度被协同协调以稳定手部方向和手部位置。这表明,在自然伸手运动中所应用的控制策略可以同时考虑多个任务约束。分析还进一步表明,当朝向圆柱形目标伸手时,手部方向的稳定性更强,因为它对最终手部方向的约束更多。相比之下,在施加更强的最终手部位置约束的球形目标形状条件下,手部位置的稳定性更强。这表明,不同的目标形状确实会影响伸手运动的控制策略,即使运动末端的变异性不受影响。