Department of Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
MEDIAN Unternehmensgruppe, Medicine and Quality Management, Berlin, Germany.
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 4;15(9):e0238561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238561. eCollection 2020.
Goal-directed reaching adapts to meet changing task requirements after unexpected perturbations such as a sudden switch of target location. Literature on adaptive behavior using a target switch has primarily focused on adjustments of the end-effector trajectory, addressing proposed feedback and feedforward processes in planning adjusted actions. Starting from a dynamical systems approach to motor coordination, the current paper focusses on coordination of joint angles after a target switch, which has received little attention in the literature. We argue that joint angles are coordinated in synergies, temporary task-specific units emerging from interactions amongst task, organism, and environmental constraints. We asked whether after a target switch: i) joint angles were coordinated in synergies, ii) joint angles were coordinated in a different synergy than the synergy used when moving to the original target, and iii) synergies or end-effector trajectory was adjusted first. Participants (N = 12) performed manual reaching movements toward a target on a table (stationary target trials), where in some trials the target could unexpectedly switch to a new location (switch trials). Results showed that the end-effector curved to the switched target. Joint angles were synergistically organized as shown by the large extent of co-variation based on Uncontrolled Manifold analyses. At the end of the target switch movement, joint angle configurations differed from the joint angle configurations used to move to the original stationary target. Hence, we argue, a new synergy emerged after the target switch. The order of adjustment in the synergies and in the end-effector was flexible within participants, though most often synergies were adjusted first. These findings support the two-step framework of Kay (1988) to understand the coordination of abundant degrees of freedom and to explain adaptive actions. The flexibility in the order of adjustments of synergies suggests that the coordination of DOF emerges from self-organization.
目标导向的伸手动作会适应不断变化的任务要求,例如目标位置的突然变化。关于使用目标切换的自适应行为的文献主要集中在末端执行器轨迹的调整上,解决了规划调整动作时提出的反馈和前馈过程。从运动协调的动力系统方法出发,当前的论文侧重于目标切换后关节角度的协调,这在文献中很少受到关注。我们认为关节角度是协同协调的,协同作用是暂时的、特定于任务的单位,它们是从任务、生物体和环境约束之间的相互作用中产生的。我们想知道在目标切换后:i)关节角度是否以协同作用的形式协调,ii)关节角度是否以与移动到原始目标时使用的协同作用不同的协同作用协调,以及 iii)协同作用或末端执行器轨迹是否首先调整。参与者(N=12)在桌子上执行手动到达运动(固定目标试验),在某些试验中目标可能会意外切换到新位置(切换试验)。结果表明,末端执行器弯曲到切换后的目标。关节角度以协同的方式组织,这可以从基于无控制流形分析的大程度协变看出。在目标切换运动结束时,关节角度的配置与用于移动到原始固定目标的关节角度的配置不同。因此,我们认为,在目标切换后出现了一个新的协同作用。在协同作用和末端执行器中调整的顺序在参与者之间是灵活的,尽管大多数情况下首先调整协同作用。这些发现支持 Kay(1988)的两步框架来理解大量自由度的协调,并解释自适应动作。协同作用调整顺序的灵活性表明自由度的协调是从自组织中产生的。