Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Apr 1;109(7):1066-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.11.042. Epub 2012 Jan 14.
Submaximal exercise gas analysis may be a useful method to assess and track pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) severity. The aim of the present study was to develop an algorithm, using exercise gas exchange data, to assess and monitor PAH severity. Forty patients with PAH participated in the study, completing a range of clinical tests and a novel submaximal exercise step test, which lasted 6 minutes and incorporated rest (2 minutes), exercise (3 minutes), and recovery (1 minute) ventilatory gas analysis. Using gas exchange data, including breathing efficiency, end-tidal carbon dioxide, oxygen saturation, and oxygen pulse, a pulmonary hypertension gas exchange severity (PH-GXS) score was developed. Patients were retested after about 6 months. There was significant separation between healthy controls and patients with moderate PAH (World Health Organization [WHO] class I/II) and those with more severe PAH (WHO class III/IV) for breathing efficiency, end-tidal carbon dioxide, oxygen saturation, and oxygen pulse. The PH-GXS score was significantly correlated with WHO class (r = 0.51), 6-minute walking distance (r = -0.59), right ventricular systolic pressure (r = 0.49), log N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (r = 0.54), and pulmonary vascular resistance (r = 0.71). The PH-GXS score remained unchanged in 22 patients retested (1.50 ± 0.92 vs 1.48 ± 0.94), as did WHO class (2.3 ± 0.8 vs 2.3 ± 0.8) and 6-minute walking distance (455 ± 120 vs 456 ± 103 m). Small individual changes were observed in the PH-GXS score, with 8 patients improving and 8 deteriorating. In conclusion, the PH-GXS score differentiated between patients with PAH and was correlated with traditional clinical measures. The PH-GXS score was unchanged in our cohort after 6 months, consistent with traditional clinical metrics, but individual differences were evident. A PH-GXS score may be a useful way to track patient responses to therapy.
次最大运动气体分析可能是评估和跟踪肺动脉高压 (PAH) 严重程度的有用方法。本研究的目的是开发一种算法,利用运动气体交换数据来评估和监测 PAH 的严重程度。40 名 PAH 患者参与了这项研究,完成了一系列临床测试和一项新的次最大运动台阶测试,该测试持续 6 分钟,包括休息(2 分钟)、运动(3 分钟)和恢复(1 分钟)通气气体分析。利用气体交换数据,包括呼吸效率、呼气末二氧化碳、氧饱和度和氧脉冲,开发了肺动脉高压气体交换严重程度 (PH-GXS) 评分。大约 6 个月后,患者进行了复测。健康对照组与中重度 PAH(世界卫生组织 [WHO] 分级 I/II)患者以及更严重 PAH(WHO 分级 III/IV)患者之间,呼吸效率、呼气末二氧化碳、氧饱和度和氧脉冲差异显著。PH-GXS 评分与 WHO 分级(r = 0.51)、6 分钟步行距离(r = -0.59)、右心室收缩压(r = 0.49)、N 末端 pro-B 型利钠肽原(r = 0.54)和肺血管阻力(r = 0.71)显著相关。在重新测试的 22 名患者中,PH-GXS 评分保持不变(1.48 ± 0.94 比 1.48 ± 0.92),WHO 分级(2.3 ± 0.8 比 2.3 ± 0.8)和 6 分钟步行距离(455 ± 120 比 456 ± 103 m)也保持不变。PH-GXS 评分观察到较小的个体变化,8 例改善,8 例恶化。总之,PH-GXS 评分可区分 PAH 患者,并与传统临床指标相关。在我们的队列中,6 个月后 PH-GXS 评分没有变化,与传统的临床指标一致,但存在个体差异。PH-GXS 评分可能是跟踪患者对治疗反应的有用方法。