Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, 1301 East Ann Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5616, USA.
Hear Res. 2012 Feb;284(1-2):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.12.008. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
The ability of an implanted ear to integrate multiple pulses, as measured by the slopes of detection threshold level (T level) versus pulse rate functions, may reflect cochlear health in the cochlea, as suggested by previous animal studies (Kang et al., 2010; Pfingst et al., 2011). In the current study, we examined the slopes of T level versus pulse rate functions in human subjects with cochlear implants. Typically, T levels decrease as a function of pulse rate, consistent with a multipulse integration mechanism. The magnitudes of the slopes of the T level versus pulse rate functions obtained from the human subjects were comparable to those reported in the animal studies. The slopes varied across stimulation sites, but did not change systematically along the tonotopic axis. This suggests that the slopes are dependent on local conditions near the individual stimulation sites. The characteristics of these functions were also similar to those found in animals in that the slopes for higher pulse rates were steeper than those for the lower pulse rates, consistent with a combined effect of multipulse integration and cumulative partial depolarization mechanisms at rates above 1000 pps. The maximum comfortable loudness level (C level) versus pulse rate functions were also examined to determine the effect of level on the slopes. Slopes of C-level functions were shallower than those for the T-level functions and were not correlated with those of the T-level functions, so the mechanisms underlying these two functions are probably not identical. The slopes of the T- or C-level functions were not dependent on stimulus-current level. Based on these results, we suggest that slopes of T level versus pulse rate functions might be a useful measure for estimating nerve survival in the cochlea in regions close to the stimulation sites.
植入耳整合多个脉冲的能力,如检测阈值水平 (T 水平) 与脉冲率函数的斜率所测量的那样,可能反映了耳蜗内的耳蜗健康,正如之前的动物研究所示 (Kang 等人,2010 年;Pfingst 等人,2011 年)。在当前的研究中,我们检查了植入人工耳蜗的人类受试者 T 水平与脉冲率函数的斜率。通常,T 水平随脉冲率降低,与多脉冲整合机制一致。从人类受试者获得的 T 水平与脉冲率函数的斜率的幅度与动物研究中报告的幅度相当。斜率随刺激部位的变化而变化,但沿音调轴没有系统地变化。这表明斜率取决于个体刺激部位附近的局部条件。这些功能的特征也与动物相似,即较高脉冲率的斜率比较低脉冲率的斜率更陡峭,这与高于 1000pps 时多脉冲整合和累积部分去极化机制的综合效应一致。还检查了最大舒适响度水平 (C 水平) 与脉冲率函数,以确定水平对斜率的影响。C 水平函数的斜率比 T 水平函数的斜率浅,并且与 T 水平函数的斜率不相关,因此这两个函数的机制可能不相同。T 或 C 水平函数的斜率不依赖于刺激电流水平。基于这些结果,我们建议 T 水平与脉冲率函数的斜率可能是一种有用的测量方法,可用于估计靠近刺激部位的耳蜗中神经的存活情况。