• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估超过 1000 例植入式经皮骨传导装置:皮肤反应和植入物存活率。

Assessment of more than 1,000 implanted percutaneous bone conduction devices: skin reactions and implant survival.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Otol Neurotol. 2012 Feb;33(2):192-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318241c0bf.

DOI:10.1097/MAO.0b013e318241c0bf
PMID:22246385
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses soft tissue reactions and implant stability of 1,132 percutaneous titanium implants (970 patients) for bone conduction devices (BCDs). In addition, it examines BCD usage and comparisons between different patient groups.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective survey. Mean follow-up time of 4.6 years.

SETTING

Tertiary care referral center.

PATIENTS

The surveyed cohort was divided into 3 different age groups (children, adults, and the elderly). In addition, 4 groups with variable loading times (i.e., the time between placement of the implant and loading the BCD sound processor) were identified as well as a subgroup of patients with mental retardation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Soft tissue reactions around the percutaneous implants as classified by the Holgers grading system, implant failure, and revision surgery rates.

RESULTS

In 95.5% of the 7,415 observations of 1,132 implants, there were no adverse soft tissue reactions. Implant loss was 8.3%. Significantly more soft tissue reactions and implant failures were observed in children compared with adults and the elderly (p < 0.05). Implant survival was lower in patients with mental retardation compared with patients without mental retardation (p = 0.001). The loading time did not influence the occurrence of soft tissue reactions and implant survival rates.

CONCLUSION

Children and patients with mental retardation are the most vulnerable to soft tissue reactions and implant losses. Additional and more frequent care needs to be given during outpatient consultations. Because loading as early as 3 to 5 weeks did not negatively affect skin reactions or implant survival, full BCD installation can occur earlier without risk.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了 1132 个经皮钛植入物(970 例患者)用于骨导式听力设备(BCD)的软组织反应和种植体稳定性。此外,还研究了 BCD 的使用情况以及不同患者群体之间的比较。

研究设计

回顾性调查。平均随访时间为 4.6 年。

设置

三级转诊中心。

患者

被调查的队列分为 3 个不同的年龄组(儿童、成人和老年人)。此外,还确定了 4 个具有不同加载时间(即植入物放置与 BCD 声音处理器加载之间的时间)的组,以及一组智力障碍患者的亚组。

主要观察指标

根据 Holgers 分级系统分类的经皮植入物周围的软组织反应、种植体失败和翻修手术率。

结果

在 1132 个种植体的 7415 次观察中,有 95.5%没有出现不良的软组织反应。种植体丢失率为 8.3%。与成人和老年人相比,儿童的软组织反应和种植体失败明显更多(p < 0.05)。与无智力障碍的患者相比,智力障碍患者的种植体存活率较低(p = 0.001)。加载时间不会影响软组织反应和种植体存活率。

结论

儿童和智力障碍患者最容易发生软组织反应和种植体丢失。在门诊咨询期间需要给予额外和更频繁的护理。因为在 3 至 5 周内加载不会对皮肤反应或种植体存活率产生负面影响,因此可以更早地进行完整的 BCD 安装而不会带来风险。

相似文献

1
Assessment of more than 1,000 implanted percutaneous bone conduction devices: skin reactions and implant survival.评估超过 1000 例植入式经皮骨传导装置:皮肤反应和植入物存活率。
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Feb;33(2):192-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318241c0bf.
2
Titanium fixtures for bone-conduction devices and the influence of type 2 diabetes mellitus.骨导设备用钛夹具和 2 型糖尿病的影响。
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Aug;33(6):1013-7. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318259b36c.
3
Long-term complications of bone-anchored hearing aids: a 14-year experience.骨锚式助听器的长期并发症:14年经验总结
J Laryngol Otol. 2009 Feb;123(2):170-6. doi: 10.1017/S0022215108002521. Epub 2008 May 20.
4
Long-Term Outcomes of a Percutaneous Wide-Diameter Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: A Clinical Evaluation of More than 800 Implants.经皮宽直径骨锚定式听力植入物的长期疗效:超过 800 例植入物的临床评估。
Otol Neurotol. 2024 Jun 1;45(5):e435-e442. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004200.
5
Stability, survival, and tolerability of a novel baha implant system: six-month data from a multicenter clinical investigation.新型骨锚式助听器系统的稳定性、生存能力和耐受性:来自多中心临床研究的六个月数据。
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Aug;32(6):1001-7. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182267e9c.
6
Comparison between a new implantable transcutaneous bone conductor and percutaneous bone-conduction hearing implant.新型经皮骨导式骨传导植入物与经皮骨导式听力植入物的比较。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Aug;34(6):1071-5. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182868608.
7
Extraoral implants in the rehabilitation of craniofacial defects: implant and prosthesis survival rates and peri-implant soft tissue evaluation.口腔外种植体用于颅面缺损修复:种植体及修复体生存率和种植体周围软组织评估
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jul;70(7):1551-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.011.
8
Stability of osseointegrated bone conduction systems in children: a pilot study.儿童骨整合骨导系统的稳定性:一项初步研究。
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Jul;33(5):797-803. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318255dd73.
9
The new Baha implant: a prospective osseointegration study.新的 Baha 植入物:一项前瞻性骨整合研究。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Jun;146(6):979-83. doi: 10.1177/0194599812438042. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
10
Evaluation of Bone Conduction Implant Stability and Soft Tissue Status in Children in Relation to Age, Bone Thickness, and Sound Processor Loading Time.评估儿童骨传导植入物稳定性及软组织状况与年龄、骨厚度和声处理器加载时间的关系。
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Aug;36(7):1209-15. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000683.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety profiles of bone-conduction hearing implants revisited: A meta-analytic comparison adjusted for follow-up time.骨传导听力植入物安全性概况再探讨:一项针对随访时间进行调整的荟萃分析比较
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jun 6. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09502-w.
2
Role of early hearing aid experience in speech recognition in patients with bilateral congenital microtia following Bonebridge implantation: a retrospective cohort study.早期助听器佩戴经历在双侧先天性小耳畸形患者接受骨桥植入术后言语识别中的作用:一项回顾性队列研究
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Mar;281(3):1205-1214. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08210-7. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
3
Post-implantation clinical cost analysis between transcutaneous and percutaneous bone conduction devices.
经皮与经皮骨导植入后临床成本分析。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jan;281(1):117-127. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08099-2. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
4
Audiological assessment with Matrix sentence test of percutaneous vs transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aids: a pilot study.经皮与经皮骨锚式助听骨导听力评估:一项初步研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Sep;280(9):4065-4072. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07918-w. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
5
Complications of Transcutaneous Protheses - A Systematic Review of Publications Over the Past 10 Years.经皮假体的并发症——过去10年出版物的系统评价
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Feb 4;26(3):e505-e512. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742352. eCollection 2022 Jul.
6
The Minimally Invasive Star-Shaped Incision Technique and the Linear Incision Technique With Tissue Preservation for Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices: A Retrospective Cohort Study.用于经皮骨传导装置的微创星形切口技术与保留组织的线性切口技术:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 21;9:863997. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.863997. eCollection 2022.
7
Percutaneous Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: Is It Clinically Useful in Korean?经皮骨锚式听力植入:在韩国临床上是否有用?
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Jun 13;37(23):e182. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e182.
8
In-office Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants via Minimally Invasive Punch Technique in a Veteran Population.门诊微创经皮穿刺技术植入骨锚式助听器在退伍军人中的应用。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;167(6):959-963. doi: 10.1177/01945998221086841. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
9
The Bonebridge BCI 602 Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant in Children: Objective and Subjective Benefits.儿童Bonebridge BCI 602有源经皮骨传导植入物:客观和主观益处
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 16;10(24):5916. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245916.
10
Multimodal Analysis of the Tissue Response to a Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: Presentation of a Two-Year Case Report of a Patient With Recurrent Pain, Inflammation, and Infection, Including a Systematic Literature Review.骨锚式助听器组织反应的多模态分析:一名复发性疼痛、炎症和感染患者的两年病例报告,包括系统文献综述
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Mar 30;11:640899. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.640899. eCollection 2021.