Sports Medicine Research Laboratory, Public Research Center for Health, 1460 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Apr;20(4):652-62. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1878-1. Epub 2012 Jan 14.
The purpose was to provide an overview of the non-invasive devices measuring static rotational knee laxity in order to formulate recommendations for the future.
Early cadaver studies provided evidence that sectioning the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) led to an increase of static rotational knee laxity of approximately 10-20% between full extension and 30° of knee flexion. Sections of the menisci or of the peripheral structures induced a much higher increase in rotation. This supported the hypothesis that static rotation measurements might be useful for the diagnosis of ACL or associated injuries. In vivo evaluations with measurement devices are relatively new. Several articles were published during the last decade with many different devices and important differences were seen in absolute rotational knee laxity between them. This was due to the varying precision of the devices, the variability in patient positioning, the different methods of measurement, examination protocols and data analysis. As a consequence, comparison of the available results should be performed with caution. Nevertheless, it has been established that rotational knee laxity was greater in females as compared to males and that the inter-subject variability was high. For this reason, it will probably be difficult to categorise injured patients preoperatively, and the interpretation of the results should probably be limited to side-to-side differences.
Future studies will show whether rotational laxity measurements alone will be sufficient to provide clinically relevant data or if they should be combined to static sagittal laxity measurements.
旨在概述用于测量膝关节静态旋转松弛度的非侵入性设备,以便为未来制定建议。
早期的尸体研究提供了证据,表明前交叉韧带 (ACL) 的切断导致膝关节在完全伸展和 30°屈曲之间的静态旋转松弛度增加约 10-20%。半月板或周围结构的部分切除会导致更大的旋转增加。这支持了静态旋转测量可能有助于诊断 ACL 或相关损伤的假设。使用测量设备进行的体内评估相对较新。过去十年发表了几篇文章,使用了许多不同的设备,并且在它们之间绝对旋转膝关节松弛度方面存在重要差异。这是由于设备的精度不同、患者定位的变化、测量方法、检查方案和数据分析的不同。因此,应该谨慎地比较现有结果。尽管如此,已经确定女性的膝关节旋转松弛度大于男性,并且个体间的变异性很高。因此,术前可能难以对受伤患者进行分类,并且对结果的解释可能仅限于左右侧差异。
未来的研究将表明旋转松弛度测量本身是否足以提供临床相关数据,或者它们是否应与静态矢状松弛度测量相结合。