Greer Joy A, Smith Ariana L, Arya Lily A
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Division of Urogynecology, Department of OB-GYN, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283, USA.
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Jun;23(6):687-97. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1651-5. Epub 2012 Jan 14.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of existing physiotherapy modalities for the treatment of urge urinary incontinence (UUI). A systematic review was performed for primary studies of physiotherapy techniques for UUI published in English between 1996 and August 2010 in major electronic databases. Only randomized clinical trials that reported outcomes separately for women with UUI were included. Outcomes assessed were reduction in UUI, urinary frequency, and nocturia. Data from 13 full-text trials including the modalities of pelvic floor muscles exercises with or without biofeedback, vaginal electrical stimulation, magnetic stimulation, and vaginal cones were analyzed. The methodologic quality of these trials was fair. Significant improvement in UUI was reported for all physiotherapy techniques except vaginal cone therapy. There are insufficient data to determine if pelvic physiotherapy improves urinary frequency or nocturia. Evidence suggests that physiotherapy techniques may be beneficial for the treatment of UUI.
本研究的目的是评估现有物理治疗方法对治疗急迫性尿失禁(UUI)的有效性。对1996年至2010年8月期间在主要电子数据库中发表的关于UUI物理治疗技术的英文初级研究进行了系统综述。仅纳入了分别报告UUI女性患者结局的随机临床试验。评估的结局包括UUI、尿频和夜尿症的减少。分析了来自13项全文试验的数据,这些试验包括盆底肌肉锻炼(有或无生物反馈)、阴道电刺激、磁刺激和阴道球囊等治疗方法。这些试验的方法学质量一般。除阴道球囊治疗外,所有物理治疗技术均报告UUI有显著改善。尚无足够数据确定盆底物理治疗是否能改善尿频或夜尿症。有证据表明,物理治疗技术可能对UUI的治疗有益。