Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2013;20(1):3-12. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2011.648676. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
Safety incentive and penalty (I/P) provisions in construction contracts are one of the most common forms of I/P. Contradictory opinions on the effectiveness of these provisions have been expressed in the literature. Statistics on safety provisions were collected from 32 construction projects, which include both types of contracts - those with safety I/P provisions and those without them. Although inclusion of safety I/P provisions in contracts helps in improving the overall safety performance in construction projects, further scope for improvement still exists. Literature review and structured personal interviews, coupled with a survey based on preliminary questionnaire, revealed that successful formulation and implementation of such provisions are dependent on 25 attributes which need the attention of both clients and contractors. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted to evaluate these attributes. The six factors extracted by carrying out factor analysis are: incentive distribution method, proper labour training, special attention to risky situations, role of safety committee and sub-contractors, specialised works and safety equipments, and right form of I/P. If taken care of, these attributes have the potential to improve the safety performance in construction projects. The results would be useful to clients and contractors in implementing the safety I/P provisions and thereby improving safety performance.
安全激励和处罚(I/P)条款在建筑合同中是最常见的 I/P 形式之一。文献中对这些条款的有效性表达了相互矛盾的观点。从 32 个建筑项目中收集了安全条款的统计数据,这些项目包括有安全 I/P 条款和没有安全 I/P 条款的合同。尽管合同中包含安全 I/P 条款有助于提高建筑项目的整体安全绩效,但仍有进一步改进的空间。文献回顾、结构化个人访谈以及基于初步问卷的调查表明,成功制定和实施这些条款取决于 25 个属性,这些属性需要客户和承包商的关注。进行了基于问卷的调查以评估这些属性。通过进行因素分析提取了六个因素:激励分配方法、适当的劳动力培训、特别关注危险情况、安全委员会和分包商的作用、专业工作和安全设备,以及正确的 I/P 形式。如果加以注意,这些属性有可能提高建筑项目的安全绩效。研究结果将对客户和承包商实施安全 I/P 条款并提高安全绩效有用。