• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

垂体后叶素与去甲肾上腺素治疗感染性休克患者的临床研究

[A clinical study of pituitrin versus norepinephrine in the treatment of patients with septic shock].

作者信息

Han Xu-dong, Sun Hua, Huang Xiao-ying, Zhang Su-yan, Wang Ya-dong, Ren Ke, Li Feng

机构信息

Third Hospital of Nantong City, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2012 Jan;24(1):33-7.

PMID:22248749
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether pituitrin can lower 28-day mortality as compared with treatment with norepinephrine (NE) in patients with septic shock.

METHODS

Randomized, controlled, open-label trial was conducted. One hundred and thirty-nine septic shock patients with dopamine requirements exceeding 5 μg×kg(-1)×min(-1) were divided at random into two groups as the study group and control group. All patients enrolled were treated by the same treatment principle and measures. In patients of study group injection of pituitrin 0.017-0.042 U/min (1.0- 2.5 U/h) was given, and if hemodynamics was still unstable, catecholamines was added to obtain the target blood pressure; while in the control group catecholamines was given to maintain stability of hemodynamics.

RESULTS

Among 139 patients enrolled in the study, 66 composed of the clinical study group and 73 in the control group. The main principle of the treatment in the two groups was similar. There was no significant difference in overall 28-day mortality rate between study group and control group (40.9% vs. 46.6%, P > 0.05). In patients whose acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II ( APACHE II ) score was less than 25, the mortality of study group was significantly lower than that of control group [10.3% (3/29) vs. 35.7% (10/28), P < 0.05]. The length of stay in intensive care unit [ICU, days: 5(3,8) vs. 5(3,8)], and duration of mechanical ventilation [days: 4.0 (2.8, 6.0) vs. 4.0 (2.0, 5.0)] were similar in two groups (both P > 0.05). The dosage of NE (μg/min: 7.99 ± 5.02 vs. 10.12 ± 5.12) and heart rate (beat/min: 93.27 ± 7.84 vs. 108.45 ± 12.31) were significantly lower in study group compared with that of control group (both P < 0.05). Serum creatinine and lactate levels in the two groups were similar at baseline, and creatinine [μmol/L: 87.5 (62.8, 157.0) vs. 76.0 (52.5, 117.0)] and lactate level (mmol/L: 3.72 ± 2.47 vs. 3.53 ± 1.86) were still similar in two groups 24 hours later (all P > 0.05). The rate of use of glucocorticoid (43.9% vs. 31.5%) and heparin in small dosage (42.4% vs. 41.1%) had no significant difference between two groups (both P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined use of pituitrin in patients with septic shock can reduce the dosage of catecholamines, and decrease the heart rate. Although it can not lower the overall mortality of septic shock, among patients with less severity whose APACHE II score lower than 25, low-dose pituitrin in conjunction with catecholamine vasopressors can reduce 28-day mortality .

摘要

目的

探讨在感染性休克患者中,与去甲肾上腺素(NE)治疗相比,垂体后叶素是否能降低28天死亡率。

方法

进行随机、对照、开放标签试验。139例多巴胺需求量超过5μg×kg⁻¹×min⁻¹的感染性休克患者随机分为研究组和对照组。所有纳入患者均采用相同的治疗原则和措施。研究组患者静脉注射垂体后叶素0.017 - 0.042U/min(1.0 - 2.5U/h),若血流动力学仍不稳定,则加用儿茶酚胺类药物以达到目标血压;而对照组给予儿茶酚胺类药物以维持血流动力学稳定。

结果

在139例纳入研究的患者中,临床研究组66例,对照组73例。两组治疗的主要原则相似。研究组与对照组的总体28天死亡率无显著差异(40.9%对46.6%,P>0.05)。急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II(APACHE II)小于25分的患者中,研究组的死亡率显著低于对照组[10.3%(3/29)对35.7%(10/28),P<0.05]。两组在重症监护病房(ICU)的住院时间[天数:5(3,8)对5(3,8)]以及机械通气时间[天数:4.0(2.8,6.0)对4.0(2.0,5.0)]相似(均P>0.05)。研究组的NE用量(μg/min:7.99±5.02对10.12±5.12)和心率(次/分钟:93.27±7.84对108.45±12.31)均显著低于对照组(均P<0.05)。两组血清肌酐和乳酸水平在基线时相似,24小时后肌酐[μmol/L:87.5(62.8,157.0)对76.0(52.5,117.0)]和乳酸水平(mmol/L:3.72±2.47对3.53±1.86)仍相似(均P>0.05)。两组糖皮质激素使用率(43.9%对31.5%)和小剂量肝素使用率(42.4%对41.1%)无显著差异(均P>0.05)。

结论

感染性休克患者联合使用垂体后叶素可减少儿茶酚胺类药物用量,并降低心率。虽然它不能降低感染性休克的总体死亡率,但在APACHE II评分低于25分、病情较轻的患者中,小剂量垂体后叶素联合儿茶酚胺类血管升压药可降低28天死亡率。

相似文献

1
[A clinical study of pituitrin versus norepinephrine in the treatment of patients with septic shock].垂体后叶素与去甲肾上腺素治疗感染性休克患者的临床研究
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2012 Jan;24(1):33-7.
2
[The clinical application and value of intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with septic shock].主动脉内球囊反搏在感染性休克患者中的临床应用及价值
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2012 Jan;24(1):46-9.
3
[The significance of lactic acid in early diagnosis and goal-directed therapy of septic shock patients].[乳酸在脓毒性休克患者早期诊断及目标导向治疗中的意义]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Jan;26(1):51-5.
4
Terlipressin in the treatment of late phase catecholamine-resistant septic shock.特利加压素治疗晚期儿茶酚胺抵抗性感染性休克
Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Jun;59(116):1043-7. doi: 10.5754/hge10550.
5
[Treatment of septic shock in children with low dose pituitrin: report of 24 cases].[小剂量垂体后叶素治疗小儿感染性休克24例报告]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Nov;49(11):858-61.
6
Interaction of vasopressin infusion, corticosteroid treatment, and mortality of septic shock.血管加压素输注、皮质类固醇治疗与感染性休克死亡率之间的相互作用。
Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):811-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181961ace.
7
[The effect of low-dose hydrocortisone on requirement of norepinephrine and lactate clearance in patients with refractory septic shock].[小剂量氢化可的松对难治性感染性休克患者去甲肾上腺素需求量及乳酸清除率的影响]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2009 Sep;21(9):529-31.
8
Diastolic arterial blood pressure: a reliable early predictor of survival in human septic shock.舒张期动脉血压:人类感染性休克生存的可靠早期预测指标。
J Trauma. 2008 May;64(5):1188-95. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31811f3a45.
9
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with septic shock.粒细胞集落刺激因子用于感染性休克患者的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
Crit Care Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):448-54. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0B013E318161E480.
10
Does dopamine administration in shock influence outcome? Results of the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) Study.休克时给予多巴胺会影响预后吗?急重症患者脓毒症发生率(SOAP)研究结果
Crit Care Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):589-97. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000201896.45809.E3.

引用本文的文献

1
Applicability of Vasopressor Trials in Adult Critical Care: A Prospective Multicentre Meta-Epidemiologic Cohort Study.血管加压药试验在成人重症监护中的适用性:一项前瞻性多中心Meta-流行病学队列研究
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Sep 30;14:1087-1098. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S372340. eCollection 2022.
2
Non-catecholamine vasopressors in the treatment of adult patients with septic shock-evidence from meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.非儿茶酚胺类血管升压药治疗成人感染性休克——来自随机临床试验的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析的证据
J Intensive Care. 2020 Oct 31;8(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s40560-020-00500-0.
3
Clinical Efficiency of Vasopressin or Its Analogs in Comparison With Catecholamines Alone on Patients With Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
血管加压素或其类似物与单独使用儿茶酚胺相比对感染性休克患者的临床疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2020 May 6;11:563. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00563. eCollection 2020.
4
Terlipressin in septic shock: what do we know?特利加压素治疗感染性休克:我们了解些什么?
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Apr;12(4):1632-1634. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.40.
5
Canadian Critical Care Society clinical practice guideline: The use of vasopressin and vasopressin analogues in critically ill adults with distributive shock.加拿大重症监护学会临床实践指南:血管加压素和血管加压素类似物在分布性休克危重症成人中的应用。
Can J Anaesth. 2020 Mar;67(3):369-376. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01546-x. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
6
Comparative efficacy of vasoactive medications in patients with septic shock: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.比较血管活性药物在感染性休克患者中的疗效:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2019 May 14;23(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2427-4.
7
The effects and safety of vasopressin receptor agonists in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.血管加压素受体激动剂在脓毒性休克患者中的作用和安全性:一项荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Crit Care. 2019 Mar 14;23(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2362-4.
8
Association of Vasopressin Plus Catecholamine Vasopressors vs Catecholamines Alone With Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Distributive Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.血管加压素联合儿茶酚胺类血管加压药与儿茶酚胺类药物单独用于分布性休克患者心房颤动的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1889-1900. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.4528.
9
Vasopressors for hypotensive shock.用于低血压性休克的血管加压药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 15;2(2):CD003709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003709.pub4.