Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minnesota, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jan 17;156(2):141-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-2-201201170-00010.
Identifying the appropriate wheelchair for a person who needs one has implications for both disabled persons and society. For someone with severe locomotive problems, the right wheelchair can affect mobility and quality of life. However, policymakers are concerned about the increasing demand for unnecessarily elaborate chairs. The Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, issued 4 reports between 2009 and 2011 detailing fraud and misapplication of Medicare funds for powered wheelchairs, more than a decade after similar concerns were first raised by 4 contractors who process claims for durable medical equipment. Subsequent concerns have arisen about whether some impaired persons who need wheeled mobility devices may now be inappropriately denied coverage. A transparent, evidence-based approach to wheeled mobility service delivery (the matching of mobility-impaired persons to appropriate devices and supporting services) might lessen these concerns. This review describes the process of wheeled mobility service delivery for long-term wheelchair users with complex rehabilitation needs and presents findings from a survey of the literature (published and gray) and interviews with key informants. Recommended steps in the delivery process were identified in textbooks, guidelines, and published literature. Delivery processes shared many commonalities; however, no research supports the recommended approaches. A search of bibliographic databases through March 2011 identified 24 studies that evaluated aspects of wheeled mobility service delivery. Most were observational, exploratory studies designed to determine consumer use of and satisfaction with the process. The evidence base for the effectiveness of approaches to wheeled mobility service delivery is insufficient, and additional research is needed to develop standards and guidelines.
为需要轮椅的人选择合适的轮椅对残疾人和社会都有影响。对于严重行动障碍的人来说,合适的轮椅会影响其行动能力和生活质量。然而,政策制定者担心对不必要的复杂轮椅的需求不断增加。美国卫生与公众服务部监察长办公室在 2009 年至 2011 年期间发布了 4 份报告,详细说明了医疗保险资金被用于电动轮椅的欺诈和不当使用,这是在 4 家处理耐用医疗设备索赔的承包商首次提出类似担忧的十多年后。随后出现了一些担忧,即现在是否可能不恰当地拒绝为需要轮式移动设备的某些残疾人士提供保险。采用透明、基于证据的轮式移动服务提供方法(将行动障碍人士与适当的设备和支持服务相匹配)可能会减轻这些担忧。本综述描述了为有复杂康复需求的长期轮椅使用者提供轮式移动服务的过程,并介绍了对文献(已发表和灰色文献)的调查结果以及对主要知情人的访谈结果。在教科书、指南和已发表文献中确定了服务提供过程中的推荐步骤。服务提供过程有许多共同之处;然而,没有研究支持推荐的方法。通过对 2011 年 3 月之前的文献数据库进行检索,共确定了 24 项评估轮式移动服务提供各个方面的研究。其中大多数是观察性、探索性研究,旨在确定消费者对该过程的使用情况和满意度。轮式移动服务提供方法的有效性的证据基础不足,需要开展更多的研究来制定标准和指南。