Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linnaeus Centre HEAD, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Aug;80(4):649-61. doi: 10.1037/a0027021. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
Our aim in this randomized controlled trial was to investigate the effects on global tinnitus severity of 2 Internet-delivered psychological treatments, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), in guided self-help format.
Ninety-nine participants (mean age = 48.5 years; 43% female) who were significantly distressed by tinnitus were recruited from the community. Participants were randomly assigned to CBT (n = 32), ACT (n = 35), or a control condition (monitored Internet discussion forum; n = 32), and they were assessed with standardized self-report measures (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Quality of Life Inventory; Perceived Stress Scale; Tinnitus Acceptance Questionnaire) at pre-, posttreatment (8 weeks), and 1-year follow-up.
Mixed-effects linear regression analysis of all randomized participants showed significant effects on the primary outcome (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory) for CBT and for ACT compared with control at posttreatment (95% CI [-17.03, -2.94], d = 0.70, and 95% CI [-16.29, -2.53], d = 0.68, respectively). Within-group effects were substantial from pretreatment through 1-year-follow-up for both treatments (95% CI [-44.65, -20.45], d = 1.34), with no significant difference between treatments (95% CI [-14.87, 11.21], d = 0.16).
Acceptance-based procedures may be a viable alternative to traditional CBT techniques in the management of tinnitus. The Internet can improve access to psychological interventions for tinnitus.
本随机对照试验的目的是研究两种互联网心理治疗方法,即接受与承诺疗法(ACT)和认知行为疗法(CBT),在指导自助模式下对整体耳鸣严重程度的影响。
从社区招募了 99 名(平均年龄=48.5 岁;43%为女性)因耳鸣而严重苦恼的参与者。参与者被随机分配到 CBT(n=32)、ACT(n=35)或对照组(监测互联网讨论论坛;n=32),并使用标准化自我报告量表(耳鸣残疾量表;医院焦虑和抑郁量表;生活质量量表;感知压力量表;耳鸣接受问卷)进行评估,分别在治疗前、治疗后(8 周)和 1 年随访时进行评估。
对所有随机参与者的混合效应线性回归分析显示,与对照组相比,CBT 和 ACT 在治疗后(95%CI[-17.03,-2.94],d=0.70 和 95%CI[-16.29,-2.53],d=0.68)对主要结局(耳鸣残疾量表)有显著影响。两种治疗方法从治疗前到 1 年随访的组内效应均较大(95%CI[-44.65,-20.45],d=1.34),两种治疗方法之间无显著差异(95%CI[-14.87,11.21],d=0.16)。
基于接受的程序可能是耳鸣管理中替代传统 CBT 技术的可行方法。互联网可以改善对耳鸣的心理干预措施的获取。